<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Russian losses 2025-03-09	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/</link>
	<description>News and analysis about the war in Ukraine and other global events in world politics and security.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 15:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MXT		</title>
		<link>https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-17869</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MXT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 18:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johanno1.se/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-17869</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Test1&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: johan No.1		</title>
		<link>https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16623</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johan No.1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 01:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johanno1.se/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16623</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Has UA retreated from Kursk?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has UA retreated from Kursk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mats		</title>
		<link>https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16613</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 18:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johanno1.se/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16613</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Many ominous reports about Kursk now. Russia probably wants Kursk before the Saudi negotiations and seems to have gained momentum now with its significant advantage in the number of soldiers. Unfortunately, Ukraine seems to be quickly losing this Kursk negotiating advantage. Hopefully, they manage to retreat in a controlled manner and cause Russia significant losses.

https://bsky.app/profile/maks23.bsky.social/post/3ljxltffg3c26]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many ominous reports about Kursk now. Russia probably wants Kursk before the Saudi negotiations and seems to have gained momentum now with its significant advantage in the number of soldiers. Unfortunately, Ukraine seems to be quickly losing this Kursk negotiating advantage. Hopefully, they manage to retreat in a controlled manner and cause Russia significant losses.</p>
<p><a href="https://bsky.app/profile/maks23.bsky.social/post/3ljxltffg3c26" rel="nofollow ugc">https://bsky.app/profile/maks23.bsky.social/post/3ljxltffg3c26</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MXT		</title>
		<link>https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16612</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MXT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 17:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johanno1.se/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16611&quot;&gt;Lynx&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, quite interesting actually. Saw something about it on Omni as well. China is known to have bought some, but Europe&#039;s holdings were significantly larger. The problem, it was argued, is that if one starts selling off, the value will quickly drop, resulting in significant losses, but it could still be used as leverage if needed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16611">Lynx</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, quite interesting actually. Saw something about it on Omni as well. China is known to have bought some, but Europe&#8217;s holdings were significantly larger. The problem, it was argued, is that if one starts selling off, the value will quickly drop, resulting in significant losses, but it could still be used as leverage if needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lynx		</title>
		<link>https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16611</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 17:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johanno1.se/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In today&#039;s Expressen, there was a mention that Europe owns a significant share of the US state debt. A bit amusing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today&#8217;s Expressen, there was a mention that Europe owns a significant share of the US state debt. A bit amusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Westley Richard		</title>
		<link>https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16597</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Westley Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 16:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johanno1.se/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is claimed that Putin has helped the madman Rocketman develop a submarine capable of carrying nuclear weapons. Trump should perhaps be a bit careful about who he appoints as BFF. It could get a bit tricky when it shows up in the Gulf of Mexico heading towards Mar-a-Lago.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/08/asia/north-korea-nuclear-submarine-int-latam/index.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is claimed that Putin has helped the madman Rocketman develop a submarine capable of carrying nuclear weapons. Trump should perhaps be a bit careful about who he appoints as BFF. It could get a bit tricky when it shows up in the Gulf of Mexico heading towards Mar-a-Lago.</p>
<p><a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/08/asia/north-korea-nuclear-submarine-int-latam/index.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/08/asia/north-korea-nuclear-submarine-int-latam/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: N Eklund		</title>
		<link>https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16596</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N Eklund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johanno1.se/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16577&quot;&gt;MXT&lt;/a&gt;.

Space X is probably a bit sensitive. I remember Musk talking about the Biden administration investigating Space X for not hiring foreign workers, but at the same time, Space X is prohibited from hiring (some?) foreign workers because they are classified as a national security interest.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16577">MXT</a>.</p>
<p>Space X is probably a bit sensitive. I remember Musk talking about the Biden administration investigating Space X for not hiring foreign workers, but at the same time, Space X is prohibited from hiring (some?) foreign workers because they are classified as a national security interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MXT		</title>
		<link>https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16594</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MXT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johanno1.se/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;[Journalist]: Are you comfortable with the fact that you walked away and Ukraine may not survive?
[President Trump]: Well, it may not survive anyway.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[Journalist]: Are you comfortable with the fact that you walked away and Ukraine may not survive?<br />
[President Trump]: Well, it may not survive anyway.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: N Eklund		</title>
		<link>https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N Eklund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johanno1.se/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16571&quot;&gt;205&lt;/a&gt;.

44 attacks in Kursk, almost a doubling compared to the recent norm?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16571">205</a>.</p>
<p>44 attacks in Kursk, almost a doubling compared to the recent norm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: N Eklund		</title>
		<link>https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16591</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N Eklund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johanno1.se/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16591</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16562&quot;&gt;Mats&lt;/a&gt;.

If I understand correctly, it is during the NATO summit that countries&#039; different capabilities are to be decided. The capability that a country is deemed to have is voted on by all countries except the country in question. I&#039;m not sure, but I don&#039;t think such a decision has been made for Sweden before. I also don&#039;t think the decision is binding, but I suspect that most will follow suit in this situation.

The defense decision made in December (?) is considered outdated and surpassed by most, but a new defense committee is not being called in, and that is precisely because of the NATO summit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://johanno1.se/en/russian-losses-2025-03-09/#comment-16562">Mats</a>.</p>
<p>If I understand correctly, it is during the NATO summit that countries&#8217; different capabilities are to be decided. The capability that a country is deemed to have is voted on by all countries except the country in question. I&#8217;m not sure, but I don&#8217;t think such a decision has been made for Sweden before. I also don&#8217;t think the decision is binding, but I suspect that most will follow suit in this situation.</p>
<p>The defense decision made in December (?) is considered outdated and surpassed by most, but a new defense committee is not being called in, and that is precisely because of the NATO summit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
