Let’s see if the non-escalation doctrine was genuine or not 🧐

Hopefully there is someone sensible in the EU who can put a stop to the madness. In many countries, the green movement does not have a pivotal role. It is also the case that something that also affects our closest trading partners does not hit as hard as if we were to implement it alone.

https://bsky.app/profile/maks23.bsky.social/post/3llrmf74wwc2v

Well, the Green Party is looking forward to the introduction of emission rights on fuel, so it’s the same thing but worse. Additionally, “they” have managed to get the EU on board. – There has been very little said about this in the media, but as we all know, it doesn’t affect those living in Södermalm.

We will soon (I think everything is settled until 2027, but I could be wrong) wish to go back to “just” the reduction obligation. – My guess is that the oil companies will “voluntarily” “significantly reduce” to lower emissions (and thus the price) of fuel in the future. It’s like the obligation is just gone. Instead, it will be said that it is done for “business reasons” and through “market forces”…

The sale of electric cars is probably expected to have a sudden upswing, to the delight of the Chinese, just about when the German car industry has shut down.

The US has nothing to gain from a crisis in Europe, on the contrary. Fear that there will be a mix between the goal of an action and a side effect (as it is called in modern Swedish) of the action.

You probably need to hurry up and write something as the Green Party has started to revise its policies. Suddenly, they think that the blending obligation was a bad decision that they do not want to use to raise fuel prices. Instead, now the industry should be taxed to death, society already has everything it needs, now it just needs to circulate among the population.