{"id":4248,"date":"2026-03-11T07:46:43","date_gmt":"2026-03-11T06:46:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/johanno1.se\/todays-russian-losses-and-activities\/"},"modified":"2026-03-11T19:57:34","modified_gmt":"2026-03-11T18:57:34","slug":"todays-russian-losses-and-activities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/johanno1.se\/en\/todays-russian-losses-and-activities\/","title":{"rendered":"Today’s Russian losses and activities"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Russian Losses<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

High losses of equipment for Russia including a lot of artillery and soft vehicles. It is now the fourth day in a row that Ukraine has shot down over 2,000 UAVs per day. Very good that they can handle those quantities, at the same time it is of course also a sign that Russia has the ability to send a very large number for several days in a row. However, we do not see an increase in the significantly more expensive cruise missiles, and luckily for that as they are much harder to shoot down. The attrition war between Russia and Ukraine, where both countries have depleted most of their stocks, of course means that they prioritize cheaper technology that is easier to produce. When it comes to FPV drones, I suspect that they are actually more effective than traditional artillery. As for Shaheds, the big advantage is that they are light and cheap to manufacture and can therefore be used in large quantities. Robots are of course much more effective, but at a completely different cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n