Epstein part 2, February 13, 2026

YOU CAN WATCH THE MOVIES IN THE SUBSTACK POST UNFORTUNATELY

Epstein will be a series of long posts without further structure.

Right now, it seems like we are being spoon-fed with small disjointed quotes or some half-masked image, and then we are supposed to make the most of it, which eventually becomes ridiculous, especially since we no longer know what is false information. Everyone who can is trying to blacken their opponents with scandal, never miss a good crisis, they say.

Russian channels have started pushing a narrative that Zelensky and Ukraine are central to the Epstein documents, which of course is nonsense.

Instead, I want to discuss the likelihood that the worst-case scenario is true – and it is my opinion that it is true, but now it’s about convincing you that it’s true too.

Why, you might think quickly and very critically as you were taught in school, has Johan No.1 completely fallen down the rabbit hole here, and is it time to end the paid subscription (because you do subscribe 🧐)?

The number of witnesses and individuals, often journalists, who have tried to expose this is massive, and the number of deceased, sued, discredited in the media, or where family members have also died is likewise miles long. If one has made such an effort to silence, there must be a grain of truth in what is being said, we think down here in the rabbit hole.

You have all read about Jerry Martinger by now, I guess, after I’ve mentioned it fifteen times – completely unrelated, but he is a textbook example of what happens if you stumble upon something and refuse to keep quiet when you should, especially after being explained in overly clear bureaucratic Swedish several times.

Some things have recently happened that are pleasing –

Thomas Massie threatens to personally read out the names of the perpetrators if the DOJ continues to cover up.

I have googled Massie, and he seems to be an upright Republican who has positioned himself correctly on most major issues throughout his career.

However, there is a certain risk that it’s a nothingburger because the first six names were not American – they are trying to sacrifice a few pawns first and see if the bloodthirsty mob gives up. We’ll just have to wait and see, but Massie seems to be the real deal anyway and definitely the person you want to see leading this.

Here, I want to make a pause and clarify that the individuals you see in the film below are parliamentarians who are the primary sources – what they say should not be easily dismissed.

Even though this particular woman is a Democrat, unlike Massie.

Massie also states that he has been threatened by the FBI, they have tried to silence him.

Then Elon promises to pay the legal fees for all victims who mention names – if this is a trick, he won’t make it to the Tesla heaven, I can assure you, but IF it’s not a reptilian trick, it might unleash a flood of identified perpetrators because it’s the threats of lawsuits that have made the victims keep quiet.

Or something else, but quite a lot is about the threat of lawsuits.

Here, I am extremely cautiously optimistic and suspect that he is not entirely clean, but I wanted to mention it.

In addition to this, victims in large numbers have now begun to speak out on Twitter, the floodgates are opening, and Twitter is a very good channel for this – it is unfiltered and not behind layers of journalists and responsible editors, we get the firsthand information directly.

Released when the lid has been on for so long

And finally, in parallel with this, there is a parliamentary discussion about grooming scandals in the UK, albeit from Reform, but better than nothing.

Similar to the situation with Dumpen where the only ones defending them are SD, but that doesn’t make the issue wrong at all, even if Bodström calls them a threat to democracy. Imagine if he could be as tough on pedophiles, surely more than a few underage victims have thought before they ended their lives.

At least he has managed to appeal and get a person acquitted of sexual abuse against children. I can’t understand the case only that he has taken on that type of case before.

https://www.dagensvimmerby.se/nyheter/blaljus/e/103930/bodstrom-efter-frikannandet-han-har-fatt-upprattelse

And yes, in the UK, the argument of “national security” is highly relevant, just as it always is in Sweden when something sensitive begins to surface – like the Lex Geijer affair, and the submarine intrusions where a crushing amount of information is still classified today in 2026.

In the UK, the countermove from the Labour government has been to –

Vote down the proposal for an extended investigation into grooming scandals.

Decide that several decades of evidence material should be hastily destroyed.

Now, the Labour government in 2026 is extremely unpopular, and Kier Starmer’s position is precarious, so implementing the above, which goes against what the citizens would like to see, is very interesting.

We have almost a perfect storm brewing in the West – yes, I understand that Russia and China are rubbing their hands, but the right thing to do is to release all material and let the dominoes fall.

In the UK, it has now emerged that grooming gangs also exported underage girls abroad, but of course, they made sure they had enough for their own use. The link to the British elite is probably not far from being exposed because surely no one seriously believes that everyone who traveled from the UK to Epstein behaved flawlessly at home.

The evil is almost total – the lawyer who agreed to help Epstein’s victims has been running to Epstein the whole time he represented the victims.

My first prediction is that within a few months, abhorrent material from the Epstein investigation will start to leak because this has reached the boiling point now. There are too many within the FBI and DOJ who have had access to the material and who are not on the side of the perpetrators.

There are also several, besides Pam Bondi, who are starting to see their careers crumble, and then a resolute change of sides can save the situation – sometimes also called “rats deserting the sinking ship” or “turncoats.”

But we must reach critical mass first, timing is everything, but they are probably getting close.

How should we tackle this so we don’t dive into the completely wrong swimming pool, I’m thinking the following

1. look at what individuals who could have insight have said – well-known faces who have a lot to lose and have spoken out before. Although the parliamentarians who have seen the material and started speaking have almost made this point redundant, I’ll still go through it.

2. what happens to those who speak, the journalists who have reported, and the victims themselves. Here, the rule probably applies that if you die within 1-2 years after airing the terrible things, you can suspect that not everything is right.

3. trafficking then and now – I think the constant in all of this over the years has been to convey the victims, and if you can show historical scandals, it increases the likelihood that this was just a new setup but the same old concept.

4. Epstein’s own setup for the business – we go through his various properties and some other interesting things.

You know me by now – now there will be a detour with personal reflections. I don’t know how many posts there will be, but I want to try to use the principle of reasonableness to sort out what may be true, so there will probably be quite a bit of information in all sorts of directions.

The U137 last post will have to wait a while longer.

Contrary to what everyone thinks, I am actually trying to build a platform based on honest, transparent, and honest reporting. I have become interested in this as the amount of information is becoming sufficient to draw conclusions.

When I transition into my own experiences, it’s seamless except for making the anecdotes fun to read. I have to naturally gloss over how many beers I drink and my BitCoin holdings because no one reads a teetotaler who sold his NFTs at a 90% loss and bought BitCoin at $126,000 with leverage, and then faced a forced sale. MXT called it “hard projecting” up there in SE2 after he himself tried to switch from crypto to silver, which didn’t go so well.

Don’t forget a paid subscription to Substack if you’re still reading because we’re in the fourth year of a side job, and if you appreciate what’s written, there’s still the opportunity to show your appreciation for politically, ideologically, and otherwise independent reporting – even if Trump’s victory perfume and golden shoes simply couldn’t be resisted. I admit that I too have weaknesses, like walking the streets of my hometown smelling strongly of perfume in oversized golden shoes due to a delivery mishap, but since returns had to be paid for by oneself, it became too expensive.

Keep this separate – Epstein is a circle of many, and there are endless setups on how to solve the problem of getting enough minors to all these different circles.

Global trafficking generates large sums of money, and specifically sex trafficking amounts to 170 billion USD/year, so resourceful entrepreneurs try to find ways to make a career there as well.

Cartels would be a good ally in this business, for example, and ruthless regimes in less affluent countries – I intend to delve into this at a later date because the collaboration of organized crime with the ruling elite against the citizens was something the Soviet Union used.

And in Sweden, the UK, USA, there has been a great reluctance to expose serious criminals since the turn of the millennium, with all sorts of arguments.

A guy who makes some money before 30 and is out and about with a entourage of young women around 20 may be despised because we ourselves never reached that point and are sitting at home in front of Netflix with a tall can instead, but it’s not illegal at all and not part of criminal activity.

These are older men who have exploited minors in vulnerable positions, and the abuse is often at the level of torture. In the parliamentary inquiry currently taking place in the UK, there was a testimony about a 12-year-old girl who was raped with a whisky bottle that broke inside her.

And Labour wants to cover it up and destroy the evidence.

The group around Epstein that is now referred to is the same type of predators as rapists, pedophiles, serial killers, and all the others that society should be hunting down but doesn’t because we go after Dumpen instead and allow the term pedophile to be replaced by “minor attracted person.”

Dumpen cannot be controlled, and the likelihood of the wrong person hunting for victims eventually stumbling upon them is high, so they inadvertently uncover something with a platform that people read. Moreover, it has the unpleasant side effect that legislation and the judicial system may be tightened because they are influential.

In the 70s, the parliament believed that sex with minors was something that was needed, so we have come a long way.

Are there any similarities in how Epstein’s victims have been handled – has the media tried to smear Dumpen, are lawsuits filed against Dumpen, and are they trying to financially strangle them?

ETC and Aftonbladet have made it a bit of a profile issue to try to crush Dumpen, and yet the perpetrators are “white CIS men” who fall into the category of the highest toxic masculinity that these two media outlets claim to be fighting wholeheartedly against. Help me understand this because I can’t, that as a white CIS man, I fight against these “minor attracted persons,” but the media that claims to do so instead becomes their best defenders.

These circles hide in plain sight because there are too many enablers who either do it for money, don’t care, are coerced into assisting, or enjoy power.

In countries like the Caribbean or Angola, where I was for 12 years, it’s the difference between having food on the table or not, but in Sweden, this vice shouldn’t exist at all – yet it does.

By the way, in Angola, pedophiles are usually burned with gasoline and tires when caught by citizens, but that doesn’t include the elite or trafficking, more like the grooming scandal in the UK where instead of going free, they were burned away.

Someone once said that when it dawns on them that the girls in elementary school who were experienced in sex early on had sometimes been victims of abuse, it wasn’t a fun day – thought-provoking, at least.

How many children are subjected to sexual abuse, an organization estimates that as many as 30% experience it at some point. BRÅ writes 10%, but there is a large dark figure, and 2% lead to convictions.

So between 10% – 30% of minors are subjected to some form of sexual abuse at some point.

Statistik

When you are a younger perpetrator, you are also inexperienced and may not always understand the harm you are causing the other party, but if you are 45-50 or older, there are no excuses at all. You know exactly what you are doing and have a choice to make – you participate or you do not participate in destroying other people’s lives.

Staffan Hildebrandt participated, was praised, criticized, and became a better person in Cambodia

https://www.expressen.se/noje/staffan-hildebrands-44-ar-yngre-karlek-efter-overgreppen

Here I want to tell you about Home visitors in the UK and when we lived for two years in Edinburgh with a young child. There is a law that they should make home visits, write a report, and if there are irregularities, the court always relies on that report and acts based on the recommendations.

My wife sensed trouble right away because we received a lot of letters, and when we called, they were insistent – she turned to Google.

If necessary, Home visitors can recommend to the court that the children be taken into care, and then the police and social services come by and take action.

Then, as a parent, you have to try to find a lawyer and start navigating the maze of getting your child back, before you have it, you have no right to any information at all.

She found groups of Portuguese mothers who had organized themselves to get their children back, and the deeper we delved into this, the darker it became.

An adoption can cost 30,000 – 40,000 GBP and potential parents are desperate. Home visitors are used to identify vulnerable families, then the reports are manipulated, and the chain of events begins that leads to the state taking your children.

A Monday afternoon with two wild kids who have torn the house apart, where you run around in boxers and a stained t-shirt, and then quickly sour at how the home visitor treats you – guess how they spin it, “a violent father that is unable to provide the basic needs for the kids” or something?

We never let them in, but we also moved after a few years.

Let’s start from the back with 4.

Epstein’s Zorro Ranch was located in the middle of nowhere in New Mexico, you can look it up on a map yourself, it’s close to a small town called Stanley, coordinates 35°16’02.0″N 105°58’11.0″W

They used the Santa Fe regional airport, and from there, there is a decent road down to Albuquerque where Zorro Ranch is located on the way.

Or they had their own airport according to Google, but I can’t find any airstrip in the area, although helicopters have been able to land.

“Nearby was a private airstrip with a hangar and helipad. The property also included a ranch office, a firehouse and a seven-bay heated garage”.

https://www.wate.com/news/nexstar-media-wire/new-owners-of-jeffrey-epsteins-new-mexico-ranch-protest-property-value

The “garden” or whatever it’s called in the lower left corner of the image below has now been demolished if you look at Google Maps.

And it wasn’t a helicopter pad as claimed because it has vegetation in the middle, the helipad is triangular and seems to be located a bit further away.

A lot of gardening work and a bit secluded – an interesting detail anyway that seems to have been generally misinterpreted now as the story is being written. One might have thought that the gardening work would have been around the property in some kind of landscaped garden.

So this is the Breaking Bad corner in the USA and a bit like if Wallenberg had placed his summer residence in Vittangi.

New Mexico is a state with over 2 million inhabitants that is very poor, desert landscape, and a huge crime scene. But then it got interesting because New Mexico is also popular among billionaires and the wealthy who buy large ranches there. If you read Google, it says that they are drawn to the beautiful landscape and luxury, but a quick look at the map shows us bone-dry desert and in the same vertical band as Colorado.

The agriculture consists of pecans, chili peppers, and livestock.

Google Street View really gives that Breaking Bad feeling they projected so well in the series, and the Sinaloa and Juarez cartels have New Mexico as an important transit point into the USA, along with the usual problems of a thoroughly corrupt legal system.

New Mexico is a very important “trans-shipment-corridor” for human smuggling as well.

There also didn’t seem to be many parties at Zorro Ranch, but victims have described being there and those in charge of the ranch locally looked for women for sex parties.

The FBI never went there to investigate.

If Epstein was involved in trafficking underage girls, Zorro Ranch would be a very good base for that operation at least, too bad the FBI missed it.

He had three larger planes, and Mexico was often visited by these.

Who bought the ranch is not known, but it could of course be due to the stigma as well.

We will continue in the next post, looks like there will be at least two more since I have eleven pages in Word below where I stopped now.

Dugin, what a hit when he reasons from his position in Russia.