I have left the posts unlocked for a while and a paid subscription was added on Substack, which was fantastic, so I would like to remind everyone who reads the posts daily (or when they are posted…) that a paid subscription on Substack is valuable to me.
Now the map warriors (osints) are a bit more restrained with everything after the recent weeks’ discussions and criticism, so it will probably be even harder to predict things in the future, sad.
I read more and more critical osints often in Ukrainian, which I have to translate, so there is always an ongoing debate.
I was one of those who believed that the doomers like Defmon and Rob Lee, who were very pessimistic about Bakhmut, were completely wrong and chose to interpret everything positively for the greater good in 2023 because Ukraine was still on an upward trend and Western support was at its weakest.
In 2022 and 2023, we didn’t have the maps in the same way, and the sources I used back then have been replaced, but I used to look at actions and then weigh sources and extrapolate from that – for example, I was satisfied with Lysychansk.
Today in 2025, I stick to a group of osints, Deepstate, and Project Owl, all of whom are pro-Ukrainian, and if anything is considered to over-report positively for Ukraine, but I can live with that.
Since the fall of 2023, RU has been carrying out a sustained offensive, and according to all sources, they still have gas, even if UA themselves usually write about it.
UA offensives have been few, except for Kursk, which that bastard Trump managed to sabotage as a political bargaining chip, and some local counteroffensives to resolve tricky situations.
I had forgotten in my rants that Trump never mentioned Kursk at all before his negotiators were to land in Moscow.
And Putin refused to meet the negotiators if Ukraine did not leave Kursk.
So Ukraine left Kursk with some lame excuse days before the meeting.
Very low of Trump, despicable.
The situation is constantly changing with attacks and counterattacks, but one should be able to agree on something to begin with.
-the situation in Pokrovsk and Kupiansk was and is very tense, and in Pokrovsk, Ukraine conducted an airborne landing with its most valuable units. These are units that you prefer not to expose, but now they did it in a drone-saturated battle in the village, which is probably the biggest trap that can be encountered in a war, Lex Stalingrad.
RU is absolutely unleashing FAB bombs, which now cost up to 1500kr and more, sometimes thermobaric, with a range of up to 200km. These bombs are simply deadly, as your reinforced defense or bunker becomes your grave, and RU drops several thousand per month.
-Ukraine is retreating everywhere, even though there is a heated debate about the gray zone and how it should be interpreted – as far as I know, no one questions the “red zone,” which should indicate that the terrain is fortified by RU on the Deepstate map?
Pokrovsk
October 15

November 10

Huliaipole
October 1

November 10

We pro-Ukrainians tend to see everything in light blue and yellow with soothing elevator music in the background – while RU is losing +1000 per day, it’s just “a few hundred in Pokrovsk,” so they don’t have control over the area.
And while RU has between 27,000 attacking and up to 110,000 in the larger Pokrovsk area, it’s just “a few patrols in the gray zone.”
Russia is on the verge of collapse while Ukraine will be able to hold out indefinitely.
Many times we have seen UA do the best they can and embellish things a bit – Vuhledar was defended by a brigade that had 300 soldiers but held an area that was large even for a brigade. They received no reserves, about 30 per month, and in the end, the Russians went straight through them.
We found out about this because the brigade chose to speak out in the media to avoid being accused of cowardice and desertion.
Before that, I didn’t understand how bad the personnel supply situation was, and in the summer of 2024, Zelensky also guaranteed that everything had been resolved – I had previously chosen to listen to official UA sources and considered the alarms to be anecdotal.
A unit in battle always has an apocalyptic view of the situation.
The reason I believe it is now time to start calling a spade a spade is that Europe must start making tough decisions here – I don’t think time is on our side.
What is Europe’s plan?
I remember the “coalition of the willing” that seems to have completely fizzled out, or do you hear anything about it?
This is how Project Owl has marked up Pokrovsk, and what makes them attractive are the dated red markers confirming the positions of RU groups on that date.
It seems clear that RU has gained a foothold in all the settlements from Pokrovsk, Myrnohrad down to Kozatske, right?

RU continues with a constant swarm of gunfire, and UA carries out counterattacks where they clear areas, but it gives an indication of how far RU has advanced, right?
And that’s where the discussion is now – how should one assess whether an area is conquered or not?
Is Project Owl purely pro-Russian nowadays, which immediately raises suspicion among all of us?
You remember the official report from UA last Friday that RU tried to infiltrate Hryshyne, and it was also in Hryshyne that GUR swept in and cleaned up Russian patrols that had grouped there earlier.
Project Owl hasn’t marked anything in Hryshyne at all, right – I interpret them as still being accurate and rather conservative when it comes to bad news for UA.
This is what I believe, and we will eventually see whose reporting best reflected the situation.
I guess one day UA will leave the Pokrovsk area if things go badly, and then all those who claimed the maps were wrong will justify it to themselves by saying they did it for a good cause and then move on.
But one of the most important things we have in this war is a group of volunteer osints who dedicate a significant portion of their time to trying to report the situation at the frontlines in the most honest way possible, and they have all suddenly felt unwanted by their own side. They are already hated by the Russian side, but now they have all turned against them all of a sudden.
So what will happen in the future?
Ukraine has already used up its strategic offensive reserve in Pokrovsk and intends to hold the area – that decision was made last week. There were already geotagged videos of UA groups starting to leave the threatened encirclement southeast of Myrnohrad, but they reopened the entrance and stabilized the situation.
The Russians, on their part, have entered a ceasefire and are now moving more troops forward. They still intend to conquer Pokrovsk, and I don’t know exactly where they are in the cycle, but there is no doubt that they will resume the attack.
Since you saw the topography curves last week, you know that to the west of Pokrovsk, it slopes downwards towards the Dnieper.
That is, RU has a height advantage in dominant terrain, somewhat like Popasna 2022 perhaps?
Now, the terrain is mostly up and down everywhere, so it is definitely not possible to say that they will break through a ridge and then the lowland will spread out to the west as with the Golan Heights, but in the immediate area, Pokrovsk is dominant.
I often discuss UA’s offensive capabilities, which they have, and if I were to guess, I think it looks something like this: the better units have had an easy time getting personnel and have also been prioritized with equipment.
GUR/SOF and elite units like Airmobile, Kraken, Azov, 12th NG, and others have had it easier, and at the other end are the forgotten Territorial Brigades that have to manage with voluntary deliveries and are critically low on personnel.
Militaryland is constantly updating, and one is struck by the extensive structure of the Ukrainian armed forces now – absolutely enormous.
And above all, the size of their special forces in all its forms – there are several different branches with 10,000 personnel each according to Militaryland’s unit map.
I’m not sure how it looks in Europe, but our SOF capabilities are measured in the hundreds, and the closest we come is probably the French Foreign Legion in terms of numbers, even though they don’t quite fit into this category.
Tens of thousands in SOF are an unparalleled capability, except perhaps in the USA. Additionally, they have combat experience and have undergone rapid training courses on the job.
Just like everywhere else, it is difficult to recruit personnel for the tip of the spear (apparently they have had a journey similar to that of a Swedish municipal company 😶), and the rear functions are expanding.
Zalizhny worked with trust, which reached a breaking point when he was accused of us in the West forcing Ukraine into a disastrous offensive and was dismissed in the autumn of 2023, at which point everything would be reformed.
Initially, many brigade commanders were sacked, and Sirsky inserted those he trusted instead, which was lukewarmly received by the army at large, who lost commanders they liked and got new commanders Sirsky liked.
Then they had to sort out the personnel supply, and now they have finally managed to organize themselves into army corps, mostly to prevent Sirsky’s micromanagement, which was at the battalion level. He divided brigades and, in the end, areas were defended by five battalions from different brigades where no one was in command, and no one knew who the higher commander was.
And above all, the higher commanders didn’t know who was defending the area or how they were faring.
The offensive reserve should then be the SOF units, the 4 Ranger Regiments, and then the prioritized army corps like the 3rd, 1st Azov, airborne, and the marines for the simple reason that personnel gravitate towards them and they have an easier time getting equipment because they are somewhat famous.
I think fewer of these units engage in combat other than as special forces or in cases of emergency, so having an offensive strategic reserve is indisputable. For example, in 2023, the marines fought throughout the entire offensive.
This is a very heavy armored fist with small sharp rivets that Putin is trying to dodge by rolling with his upper body; he is short and sometimes manages to slip underneath it.
Last Monday, we reported on Rob Lee’s information about over 20,000 AWOL in a month – these are not desertions from staff positions in Lviv or Kiev but from the fronts where the situation is critical.

Some years ago, we found out that since 80% of the wounded returned to duty, the brigades were critically understaffed, they fought for about six months without relief, and leaves were scarce, so frontline service was considered a guaranteed ticket to death or severe disability.
We can get an indication of how soldiers feel about their situation with Rob Lee’s figures, right?
Again, I guess that desertion is an unknown concept in the units in the strategic reserve mentioned above.
And they even have difficulty recruiting personnel for drone units now.

I have discussed most things over the years, but a major issue was that Europe never made voluntary service in Ukraine something prestigious – there were major campaigns in Europe where they paid recruitment bonuses, good salaries from the home country, and then veteran pensions after a year of service at the front.
Initially, there were quite a few in international units, but I guess there are significantly fewer today – old marines and SOF with “three tours in Iraq” have left because death is guaranteed, and they can’t handle it.
What remains are librarians, teachers, and engineers who have nowhere to flee.
Here too, I don’t understand what the hell Europe is up to, but that’s how it is.
Since 2022, with Biden and now Trump, the USA has been following a certain line, seeing Ukraine as a pawn and making a huge strategic mistake in trying to align Russia against China. In the worst case, they have pushed the country USA off the top of the pyramid. The betrayal debate will eventually be enormous, and conspiracy theories will abound, but it was probably as simple as this – they tried to align Russia against China but no longer had ground contact because they had it too good for too long.
Despite everything, Trump is driving the USA’s formal line together with something else, which we probably guess is to appease Putin for personal gain – money is not a bad guess, and to get help to stay at the top of the USA perhaps?
Europe hasn’t behaved much better, where countries like Germany were completely infiltrated to begin with, but we have slowly been straightening out the situation.
But we are still doing too little – far too little.
My suspicion is that Europe is gambling on the worst-case scenario being that Ukraine accepts a ceasefire – that seems to be what many believe.
“Russia will never attack us.”
Define “attack,” you damn peanuts, because you can’t even think that far ahead.
That’s where almost everyone goes wrong – we have already shown that unless it is an open invasion with maneuver brigades, we will not invoke Article 5; anything below that, Russia can have fun with without consequences.
And an Article 5 will never include invading Russia, so there is also a possibility that they are willing to risk it if they manage to pull ahead of us further in critical capabilities – the idea that Russia would attack Europe is seen as impossible, but it’s something Russia is just waiting for the right moment to do.
Or if it’s about unlocking Europe for the Chinese attack on Taiwan – then they will do it as a puzzle piece in a larger game despite all our analysts’ wild protests that they are not following the rules.
Ask a Pole or a Baltic person, or someone in Finland if Russia can attack Europe.
Donald Tusk, Trump’s Polish cousin, speaks out again – Putin’s subversive activities are life-threatening.

Poland, Ukraine, Finland, and the Baltic states are very familiar with all things Russian and are trying to get the rest of Europe on board, but progress is slow.
So what is moving in the right direction for us?
China has straightened out its production capacity and efficiency, and has done the same for Russia.

China has also sold 3 million Geran engines to Russia – a certain signal of how many RU intends to produce.
The more foolish ones I’ve listened to in recent years are all negative now but try to report as truthfully as possible, and now they have received so much criticism that they have started to hold back in their reporting.
There are few bright spots on the fronts, Trump has shattered Ukraine’s hope of help from the USA, and Europe does nothing but pour money into the arms industry and hopes it stops there.
I will return to the subversive activities, but all of Europe is starting to see a large group of professional protesters on its streets demonstrating against everything, mostly against the sitting government.
And the Islamists are advancing their positions – the classic attacks on Christmas markets upset many, for example, very simple medals for the unity within the GRU responsible for the influence operation.
You see domestic politics that are relevant now – but it affects everyone, and everyone is upset with everyone else.
If it becomes difficult to govern politically, it also becomes more difficult to support Ukraine or have a united front against Russia and China.
Countries experiencing domestic chaos also leave themselves vulnerable internationally – my favorite is still Kier Starmer, who has completely lost his way and is struggling not to be ousted by his own party.
Or that we should reduce carbon emissions by 90% in the midst of a raging war – do you think Rheinmetall will soon have to stop producing military equipment?
The biggest climate villain is probably the arms industry, those bastards 😡
As I said, the most crucial months of the war, but as the West begins to tire, it is high risk for the Ukrainian bowstring to break at any moment, and then we have no backup plan.
So far, it hasn’t happened, and Ukraine is clearly showing that they will fight, but the bad news continues –
Europe is increasingly relying on domestic production within Ukraine, which Russia has noticed, so this autumn’s robot rain is targeting that in addition to the energy infrastructure.

The USA has stopped deliveries due to the country’s shutdown.

And if you ask me, Europe is certainly facing major issues due to the lack of critical raw materials and products now, as China stands ready to control the tap with a broad Chinese grin.
You can be completely sure that there will be power outages in Europe this winter – risk-free for Russia, and how it will affect our industry will be interesting to see.
I assume that Ukraine also understands that their only way to break the deadlock is through an offensive, and we have described it in detail hundreds of times now, but there is still a risk that they will not achieve more than a tactical level.
What happens next if Russia can continue the war?
Because the only thing I am completely sure of is that Ukraine is Europe’s strongest defense force several times over, and they are currently retreating – there is no one in Europe who can put up an equivalent against Russia.
If Russia manages to achieve a ceasefire or, even better, create chaos in Ukraine leading to the country’s collapse, then every analyst’s assessment goes out the window because RU can release a million from the fronts in Ukraine.
In the worst case, they could persuade the UA defense force to infiltrate the wonderland of Europe to advance their careers, and even worse – if they manage to bring down Ukraine as a country and take over it politically, their border suddenly extends to western Ukraine.
Several years ago, I had to accept that Europe does not work with any risk list at all, and that we are cowardly and hesitant, but it will never cease to amaze me how we have managed to do nothing for almost four years.
We have even reneged on our promises to the Baltics that in the event of an increased threat, we would deploy our brigades in the Baltics. The threat level has risen to the point where many leaders in Europe are preparing for war, but the brigades are being held back.
It is confirmed that France and Germany have instructed hospitals to review their wartime organizations and be ready by the summer of 2026.
We certainly know how the Russian bastards will behave in the next area they conquer, and we also know that they intend to continue if they can.
It was only a few months ago that Merz, Macron, and Starmer were in meetings pledging full support for Ukraine, but that has completely faded – on this date 11/11/11, I cannot explain to you what Europe’s goals are in the Ukrainian war and what we are working towards, I cannot understand it.
11/11/11 and never again became 1939. But it started with “Anschluss” in Austria and “Sudetenland” in 1938, leading to Czechoslovakia and September 1, 1939.
Failing to do anything in 1938 led to one of our major global conflicts, and we are almost exactly following that sequence of events here.
We cannot handle Russia when China is behind them, and in reality, that is the major threat – so how will we manage to deal with China.
Since China managed to build up Russia’s arms industry, which is evident in Gerans and robots, no one can call me a liar anymore when I write that China’s own production is enormous.
And with AI drones with long range and hard-to-shoot-down robots in large quantities, which China and Russia now have, they can go a long way.
Ukraine is not in NATO and found itself invaded – and the West has been clear that we can help them help themselves.
Which other countries are not in NATO?
South Korea, Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Thailand, India.
Africa is also not in NATO, nor is South America.
“Russia will never attack us,” say the peanuts, but they forget that there are dozens of countries that we consider ours and that have the same status as Ukraine, and we will help them help themselves.
And this is where it gets tricky because Venezuela is not in NATO, but the USA seems ready to go to war against them for very little.
At the same time, they were not prepared to defend Ukraine.
And they have promised to defend South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan, which are not in NATO.
If China and Russia succeed in persuading the USA to turn inward, which they seem to be well on their way to doing, the playing field is wide open for them.
Not to mention all the former Soviet cities that became new countries when the Soviet Union fell – we will not lift a finger for them.
Europe is already “isolationist,” and the USA is well on its way, and then a whole string of countries will suddenly be in danger of being attacked.
We in Europe can continue to be peanuts but not produce anything, not defend those who want to belong to us, and then put a wet blanket over everything with a 90% reduction in emissions will not lead to a world I want to live in even if we manage the climate crisis.
But just when we thought we were winning the battle against the climate crisis, of course, a damn VOLCANO comes and destroys 20 years of emission reductions, the audacity 😡

When is the die cast for our time’s global conflict – the big million-dollar question that I’m trying to reason about.
One thing I know – when the die is cast, it’s too late to rewind the tape and then it becomes a self-reinforcing global conflict.
How will this end – probably with the West coming out as the winner but there will always be a large number of countries that do not feel like winners at all. I will come back to this in a separate post and show you which countries did not feel that May 1945 was their best month ever, or that a bright future was theirs.
But it was worth it for a world in peace – we had it very good during the Cold War if you weren’t occupied by the Soviet Union, had proxy wars in your country, had Mao as your leader, or lived under direct threat of war like us in Europe.
Fiji had it good.
Ukraine is the key to everything and if Russia manages to achieve a ceasefire or even worse – then the likelihood of us escalating globally is very high, at the same time as Europe will then exclaim “eternal peace” and confetti will rain down on the two marching companies that were tangible for the peace parade.
Does this sound familiar?
Don't forget to donate, Ukraine's cause is ours! Support Ukraine!

Russian losses in the war in Ukraine 2025-11-12
Glory to Ukraine!
Many battles, otherwise low numbers. Could it be the weather?
N Slobozhansky-Kursk 10💥↘️
S Slobozhansky 17💥↗️
Kupyansk 18 💥↗️
Lyman 12💥↗️
Slovyansk 8↗️
Kramatorsk 0
Kostjantynivka 16💥
Pokrovsk 76💥💥💥💥↗️
Oleksandrivskij 23💥↗️
Huliaypillia 3↘️
Orikhivsk 4
Prydniprovskij/Dnipro 0↘️
🇺🇦AFU: Operational information at 08:00 on 12.11.2025 about the Russian invasion
During the past day, ten battles have taken place in the northern Slobozhansky and Kursk regions. 🇷🇺AFRF has carried out 157 artillery shelling, three of which with rocket artillery systems.
In the southern Slobozhansky direction, 17 battles took place in the areas around the settlements of Vovchansk, Vovchanski Khutory, Odradne, and towards Dvorichansky.
In the Kupyansk direction, 18 attacks from 🇷🇺AFRF occurred in the past day. Defense forces repelled enemy assaults in the areas of Kupyansk, Stepova Novoselivka, Borivska Andriivka, and towards Hluskovka, Petropavlivka, and Novoosynove.
In the Lyman direction, 🇷🇺AFRF attacked 12 times. They attempted to advance in the areas around the settlements of Zarichne, Ridkodub, Nadiya, Tverdokhlibove, Kolodyazi, and towards the settlement of Korovin Yar.
In the Slovyansk direction, 🇷🇺AFRF carried out eight attacks against the 🇺🇦AFU units’ positions in the areas of Yampol, Serebryanka, Vyimka, and Dronivka in the past day.
In the direction of Kostyantynivka, 🇷🇺AFRF conducted 16 attacks in the areas around the settlements of Bila Hora, Shcherbinivka, Pleshchiivka, Kostyantynivka, Yablunivka, Rusyn Yar, and towards Sofiivka.
In the Pokrovsk direction, 🇺🇦AFU defenders halted 76 offensive actions from 🇷🇺AFRF in the areas around the settlements of Volodymyrivka, Nikanorivka, Chervonyi Lyman, Myrnohrad, Rodynske, Lysivka, Pokrovsk, Kotlyne, Udachne, Molodetske, and Novomykolaivka.
In the Oleksandrivskij direction, defense forces repelled 23 attacks against the 🇺🇦AFU troops’ positions near the settlements of Sosnivka, Stepove, Novomykolaivka, Pershotravneve, Rybne, and towards Solodke.
In the direction of Huliaipole, Ukrainian soldiers repelled three attacks in the area around the villages of Zelenyi Hai, Solodke, and Danilivka.
In the direction of Orikhiv, 🇷🇺AFRF troops attacked four times the 🇺🇦AFU positions towards the village of Primorske.
During the past day, 🇷🇺AFRF did not carry out any offensive actions towards Kramatorsk and Dnipro.
In the direction of Volyn and Polissya, there are no signs of 🇷🇺AFRF forming offensive groups detected.
Heavy but important post. Really appreciate your work but I think you would benefit from being a bit more critical sometimes: The volcano image is fake.
Yes, that was it which was a bit sour because the message was not fake 😐
What message then?
A question regarding your criticism of Europe: you are asking for maneuvers. In connection to that, you emphasize that Article 5 is not invoked. At the same time, you underline that the absence of maneuvers in/towards Europe from Russia’s side does not mean that Russia is not waging war against us. And the fact that Europe is engaging in rearmament is indeed a step forward.
So the question then is, in the absence of maneuvers, and the invocation of Article 5, is Europe waging war against Russia (besides sending material to Ukraine)? And is it effective? A major issue has been, even with the coalition of the willing, to keep Europe united. There they have surely succeeded beyond their own and Russian expectations. At the same time, the statement by the President of Poland that you mention is alarming.
Do you request that we follow established drawn-up plans regarding the Baltics?
But yes – Europe has certainly united today in 2025 better than in 2022 😀
and under Biden, no one dared to do anything they weren’t allowed to, so Trump probably broke that spell.
But it’s the result that counts, and the downside would be if Ukraine had problems or the Baltics were destabilized.
Now maybe nothing will happen, but the risk management is lacking.
Or what did you mean?
Yes, the result counts. And the risk is well, as Tusk may suggest, that Europe is doing far too little. It may be better to act now and not perfectly instead of waiting until one has “finished arming”. Ukraine definitely had not finished arming and did not wait, and luckily that’s the case, otherwise the Russians would have been at the Polish border.
Multiple comments lately the publish button dead. Ma. Must copy the message, reload the page, maybe find the comment to reply to, paste and publish again. The button can die in less than a few minutes after reloading.
Good post by Johan, but a bit too negative regarding Ukraine.
Ukraine is saving lives for future generations, something the Russians couldn’t care less about. How will Russia be able to govern a huge country from St. Petersburg to Vladivostok with such a large population decline?
Partly, there is a “natural” population decline of about 700-800,000 per year, in addition to the losses from the war. I can’t make this equation add up.
Another thing that happened yesterday. Tokayev in Kazakhstan visited Putin yesterday to sign a cooperation agreement. That surprised me at least. I thought Kazakhstan was getting closer to China. Or could it be Xi behind this.
I thought Kazakhstan had chosen Ukraine 😐
If Azerbaijan changes course, it’s a complete turnaround.
I can’t recreate the issue and therefore can’t troubleshoot either.
However, I’ve noticed that the ad blocks have returned to maximum level recently, I’ve deactivated it again so they shouldn’t show anchor and vignette ads.
I’m wondering if that could be causing the issue if you’ve had problems lately.
Does it happen both when you post a new comment and when you try to save an edited one?
When it happens, do you have other active comments that you can still edit?
It sounds a bit like something with the javascript is failing if it works right after a reload but stops working after a while. I’m thinking if it could be that countdown for how long you have left to edit somehow causing the issue.
Yes, it seems to work if I don’t delay saving after refresh. Yes, it happens for both new and editing. And also new when there is no previous one by me that can be edited (JavaScript updating remaining time). However, not completely sure. I mostly use Safari on iPhone. I’m not sure which version I have or how to check.
“!❗️🇩🇰Denmark has allocated a new, 28th package of military aid to 🇺🇦Ukraine for a total of 1.4 billion Danish kroner The funds will go towards the production of Ukrainian weapons and the purchase of weapons from the US for Ukraine”
https://bsky.app/profile/militarynewsua.bsky.social/post/3m5g5lbrmqc2l
💥🔥👍✊
“Saratov oil refinery tonight.”
https://bsky.app/profile/babayagafella.bsky.social/post/3m5fnuta63222
“Objective control from a closer angle, the AVT unit is on fire. Orsknefteorgsintez refinery. UPD: the unit is not identified.”
https://bsky.app/profile/babayagafella.bsky.social/post/3m5fppxpnfc22
“🔥 Stavrolen LLC (Budennovsk) – the image most likely shows the aftermath of a hit on two key units, – Supernova The ethylene and propylene compression and rectification unit is a key component of polyethylene production.”
https://bsky.app/profile/maks23.bsky.social/post/3m5gi7txrr22x
Is it yesterday’s or again?
should it go on the list 😀
It’s probably yesterday’s, I didn’t have time to read it yesterday so for me it was new! 😄
Ukraine stopped or shot down 90 (74%) of those UAVs But that left 31 strikes, which hit 19 different places.”
https://bsky.app/profile/twmcltd.bsky.social/post/3m5g6qxdgxs2a
If we give from the top shelf, are we tying ourselves to the mast? It would be disastrous if Ruz took over Ukraine and gained access to our cutting-edge technology, wouldn’t it? Could that be why we hesitate on what we support?
Which countries have given from the top shelf? I can still see a lot of modern equipment that donors wouldn’t want to see in enemy hands. Sweden’s Globaleye, for example.
The F-16 is not top shelf, but wouldn’t it be sad if Ruz got hold of a whole bunch of them? Or do they already have access? The Patriot as well. There are probably more, but maybe we shouldn’t list everything here in public.
Well thought out, Maggan.
The Russians have a CV 90. Surely they have dissected it down to the smallest component, like saying amen in church.
Hungary has the Gripen, right?
True. Gripen C/D. Gripen E is said to be a more competent aircraft. According to the experts.
If it means that ryz has full insight into Gripen, it shouldn’t stop us from giving C/D anyway.
Sad yellow wall today, I’d rather have a fake reality with teddy bears and rainbows, I realize.
I can hope that Ruz will soon cross the red French line as they would deploy the Foreign Legion, I want to remember that Macron said that earlier.
Then you should read Grgg:
https://x.com/coxoxoffoxoffic/status/1988534945153716717?s=46
Gregg gets to take over 😀
I appreciate as much as possible from what I see.
“⚡️ SBU exposes Russian agent from Crimea planning terrorist attacks on Kyiv metro and malls. A 55-year-old resident of Crimea has been charged in absentia.”
https://bsky.app/profile/kyivindependent.com/post/3m5gqqz7wok2v
https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-exposed-russian-agent-planing-terrorist-attacks-in-kyivs-metro-and-large-shopping-centers/
“⚡️Zelensky wants ministers implicated in corruption scandal to resign. President Volodymyr Zelensky on Nov. 12 urged Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko and Energy Minister Svitlana Hrynchuk to resign amid a large-scale corruption scandal.”
https://bsky.app/profile/kyivindependent.com/post/3m5gsxekrrk2e
Half decent.
I believe that for Europe and especially Sweden, the first step is to stop being so secretive about what the Russians are up to. Point out and clarify EVERYTHING from graffiti to sabotage of the ore railway and bombs in DHL planes. Stop discussing how likely it is that Russia is flying drones over airports, put your foot down for God’s sake. Speak plainly! List and explain everything that is happening, hide nothing, repeat and explain how everything is connected.
Publish the list of paid Russian influence operators, that’s the least one can demand.
Well done by Tusk but words alone lead nowhere, you must publish lists and facts that support the words. This has two advantages, firstly the media loves facts and especially things that were previously secret, but it also leaves a mark. My point is, has anyone seen Tusk’s words in any regular media? No, exactly, you have to make a bigger impact is what I’m trying to say.
Then continue and counter everything that goes against Russia through signals they understand (i.e. show strength).
All of this secures public opinion and the daily lives of our leaders and enables them to then undermine Russia. And with a faint hope, deceive with the trumpet along the way by showing that he can benefit from it and perhaps at the same time keep China in check BEFORE they get carried away.
Yes, that’s exactly what we should do, but those who try just get a hell of a backlash.
Macron, Starmer, and Merz all know how it feels when all Russian subversive activity focuses on them, and it’s not fun.
We will never have a compliant opposition ever in Europe, and countries in Europe will not agree and several will always ride the wave for free.
Macron has long stood alone in his attempts to confront Russia, it feels like.
Then 11 damaged cables in the Baltic Sea and the court forced Finland to release the ship they had seized?
We absolutely need to start pushing back, but how – how do we get started?
Now it seems that “Gerald R Ford” has reached the coast of Venezuela. With 90 planes on board and also with a considerable naval force, drug smugglers should probably hide in the mountains. Say what you want about Trump, but he sure has a sense of spectacle.
I’m trying to see them from where I am but so far nothing.
”She looked into several brigades and applied to those with special forces units. She had difficult conversations with her mother and her boyfriend, a soldier. Both strongly oppose her decision.”
🧵 ‘No turning back’: More and more Ukrainian women join the army to fight Russia https://x.com/anno1540/status/1988579064181842008?s=46
”There is no question of Russian control over the city of Pokrovsk or the operational encirclement of the Ukrainian Defense Forces.”
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, General Oleksandr Syrsky
🧵https://x.com/coxoxoffoxoffic/status/1988631440024551566?s=46
Well, it’s time to make a decision about Tomahawks for UA. We’ll see if it comes tonight.
”Peace talks with the Russian Federation have been suspended, Officially.”
Time for T🪓O🪓M🪓A🪓H🪓A🪓W🪓K
Tomahawks are signaling politics, should not be underestimated but in my eyes make no difference on the ground.
No, not really.
“Maverick was right in the ‘Top Gun’ sequel, ‘It’s not the plane; it’s the pilot’“
“It’s important to remember this is where we must never lose our advantage. And we can never forget that our most important investment is in the skillset and abilities of the American service members. Maverick was on to something when he proclaimed in Top Gun, “It’s not the plane; it’s the pilot.” He was right. Stealth fighters don’t win wars; people do. And they do it by leading themselves, their team, and their machines, in the harshest environment on the planet.“
Opinion by Dave Berke published in Fox News, November 12, 2025 5:00am EST: I commanded an F-35B squadron. People win wars, not technology
US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth:
If America is going to have to take the primary burden of what happens in the Indo-Pacific and deterring China, then Europe needs to be prepared to step up in its own continent and ensure that forces like Russia or others are checked properly. It’s common sense – you can’t be everywhere.
Much clearer than this, it doesn’t get that Europe must take care of its own defense.
However, the negative aspect of an official statement like this is that it becomes clear to Russia that the USA does not intend to help Europe, that Europe is weak, but will arm itself. If the Russians have plans to attack Europe, now is the time, but most of the troops are occupied in Ukraine.
So, if there is a ceasefire in Ukraine in the near future, tensions may rise in the Baltics.
Previously, it was possible for the USA to be both in Asia and in Europe and maintain order, as China was not a major threat back then. Now China has become strong, and more imperialistic, so the USA no longer has the same advantage.
But wasn’t there talk of the USA reducing its commitment in Asia earlier this summer, or am I mistaken?
“Once enemy infantry is detected, Ukrainian forces deploy strike drones to eliminate targets before sending in assault groups—a tactic that significantly reduces risk to personnel.”
https://united24media.com/latest-news/ukrainian-assault-units-push-russians-back-in-pokrovsk-street-battles-drones-lead-the-way-13366
Berlin 2012. Olympiastadium. Germany is leading 4-0. In the stands, Angela Merkel, in the process of making Europe dependent on Russian energy. To this day, this deal with Putin finances his invasion of Ukraine and sub-Article 5 warfare against the rest of Europe. Next to Merkel sits the then Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt. Whose defense minister resigned after Reinfeldt and Anders Borg declared that defense is a special interest. On the field, the Swedes are fighting in a hopeless situation.
Then it happens.
But even though Sweden turned the match in 2012, it still remains to turn the disadvantage that Chancellor Merkel and Prime Minister Reinfeldt, together with European colleagues, put Europe in by 2025. Alone on the field: Ukraine.
Merkel has actually recently discussed that the war is Ukraine’s and NATO’s fault, not Russia’s 🧐
Moreover, she blocked all attempts to bring UA into NATO earlier.
Isn’t both Merkel and Scholtz from the former GDR? i.e. authorities with Stasi connections, the same organization that Putin worked with during his service as a KGB officer in the GDR.
Political career 1989–1998: Merkel was during her time at the East German Academy of Sciences still a member of the East German Communist state youth organization Freie Deutsche Jugend (FDJ).
How close the young socialist Olaf Scholz stood to the powerful in the GDR
In fact, the same communist organization, FDJ, appears around Scholtz:
Let’s start in 1980. Scholz still had bushy hair, studied law in Hamburg, and fought within the Young Socialists against the SPD’s “right-wing” leadership. The Soviet Union had just invaded Afghanistan, and US President Jimmy Carter demanded the boycott of the Moscow Olympics. During this time, specifically on May 23, 1980, the then chairman of Juso, Gerhard Schröder, for the first time confronted the head of the communist youth organization in the GDR, Egon Krenz, during a visit to the Federal Republic. They agreed that FDJ and Jusos would establish official relations.
Two years later, Scholz became vice chairman of the Young Socialists (the youth segment within the SED) – which also put him in the spotlight of the SED. At that time, the SED invested enormous resources in the form of money, personnel, and intelligence services to get the Federal Republic to take a stand against a NATO decision to deploy similar weapons on West German territory in response to the deployment of Soviet intermediate-range missiles.
The young socialists were an important pressure group, as they had direct influence on the governing SPD and were much more credible than the communist sister organizations in West Germany. Scholz was particularly interesting to the SED because the 24-year-old man had not only distinguished himself as a harsh critic of NATO but also belonged to the Marxist Stamokap faction within Jusos.
Responsible for the Young Socialists and Scholz was the central council of FDJ
Scholz actually became an important reinforcement of the GDR’s positions in the Young Socialists’ board. Regarding rearmament, after his election victory, he wrote in the magazine Zeitschrift für Sozialistische Politik und Wirtschaft, for the progressive democratic forces in this country, there can only be a definite NO. In the discussion with other parts of the peace movement, young socialists must clearly state “that rearmament and the threat of war are necessary consequences of imperialism and that lasting peace is only possible if the capitalist social system is replaced by socialism.”
It’s actually quite incredible all of this.
Russia is playing Europe like a tired violin.
Zarkozy, Shröder, Scholz, Merkel, Nigel Farage, Corbyn – all took the money.
Hope lies with Tusk, Macron, and (now I almost forgot his name – did he go under the ice?) Merz. And to some extent Maloni. And of course Stubb and his Nordic and Baltic colleagues.
Tusk speaks as if he has read this blog, that’s good.
The Macaroni is also good at expressing himself, but wishes for a little more action, however, he did have some problems at home, conveniently after he started speaking plainly.
Merz has been a bit quiet lately, I wonder if he has also had problems at home? I wonder if Taurus even exists, there has been talk about that wonder weapon for several years, but nothing has happened.
Melonia is good, not many can command respect like an angry Italian, if so, it would be a woman from Latin America.
They believed that Russia had changed, that trade and mutual economic benefit would suffice.
Russia is only provoked by mutual benefit. They always strive for a position of power so they can exploit the other country for their own gain.
In the same way, Russia equates kindness with weakness and is provoked to attack if they sense a scent of fear, like a hungry predator.
Death to the slime monsters 🔥 ⛽️ ✊
Tom Cooper från dons weekly är nu en enemy of the state
https://xxtomcooperxx.substack.com/p/dons-weekly-10-november-2025-part