Press conference of Volodymyr Zelenskyy for representatives of Ukrainian and international media.
The Ukrainian president discusses the ongoing war with Russia, emphasizing the need for diplomatic paths to peace, continued Western military aid, and international support for national recovery.
Längd 2:00:08
Unknown speaker
Thank
Speaker 1
you.
Speaker 2
Good afternoon, dear journalists, and thank you for this opportunity to have a conversation. I wish good health to all of you. It's not the high time to congratulate everyone with the feast still. Today is the Easter, and even the aggression of the Russian Federation won't prevent us from canceling this holiday. That's why I would like to wish all of you and all of the citizens of Ukraine, I would like to wish peace and victory, and we will have a victory. And today we have a meeting in a very interesting format. The press service reported that there are a lot of requests, hundreds and thousands of requests for interviews, and unfortunately, I won't be able to find the time to talk to every one of you separately, but maybe after the victory, we'll have more time for interviews, for conversations. Now the time is very precious for our country, so I'm ready to have this press conference, so yours the questions and ours the answers. So let's start. So colleagues, please raise your tables. Luke, Gordian, please.
Speaker 4
But wait for the microphone, please, everybody, wait for the microphone.
Speaker 5
Okay. Thank you, Mr. President. We've recently seen rather strange photos from Moscow of Russia's President Vladimir Putin holding the table. Do you, can you explain why President Putin invaded Ukraine? Is he ill? Is he mad? Or is there some other reason?
Speaker 1
Well,
Speaker 2
it's hard to assess and evaluate every step made by the President of Russia. It's hard for me to tell why is he grasping the table or the armchair for the past years. I don't think this is anyhow related to making a decision on committing an aggression against Russia to hold this encroaching aggression against Ukraine, which is happening day after day and year after year end, because we know that this war has been in progress for over eight years, and we don't want to get used to this encroaching invasion, but unfortunately this is happening. And thinking on the impact, I think it is an impact on Ukraine, and Russian Federation has always wanted to have something like this happening, and frankly speaking, we are repelling this sort of impact or attempt of influencing our country, and we are succeeding, and since the very beginning of our independence, it was only we, only the people of Ukraine, who dreamed of this independence, for us it was important, for the civilized world it was important, and we can see that based on the support that we are receiving from the friendly nations, still the Russian Federation, both at the level of authorities and the level of people, because of the informational policy, and a lot of the society in Russia do not consider Ukraine as an independent country,
Speaker 1
well,
Speaker 2
they don't think that our people have the right to, well, to an independence, don't have the right to live, and we are struggling for this right to live, and therefore we are struggling for independence, for our freedom. This is the war for the freedom of Ukraine. The Channel Inter, that's the fifth row, please, the microphone. President, you've insisted on having a meeting with President Putin. Do you still insist on a personal meeting with him? Do you think this meeting may stop the war? How? And why Russia is not agreeing to have this meeting? What's your suggestion? Now, the security component, in the frames of the information that were in terms of killing you, that has to be a third country? I'm sorry, what is this? That meeting has to be on the territory of a neutral country. Do you understand the risks that you are facing
Speaker 1
personally?
Speaker 2
Well, thank you
Speaker 1
for this
Speaker 2
question, or indeed
Speaker 1
questions.
Speaker 2
Speaking on the Russian Federation and the negotiations with Russia, from the very beginning I have insisted on the talks with the leader of the Russian Federation, as I believe that any format of meeting through mediators with Russia or passing this or that information to the leader of the Russian Federation through the friendly nations, I think this will not produce the desired effect. I believe this war could only be stopped by the person who started this war. Can you hear us? That's the last train, hopefully not the last train, just the final one for today, so let's listen to the subway. That's partially an answer to this question with regards to attempts of killing me. I'm not afraid, but my security is afraid of those attempts, my family is afraid of those attempts of killing me.
Unknown speaker
Now,
Speaker 1
talking
Speaker 2
about this meeting with the President Putin, I want the war to be stopped, and there is a diplomatic path, there is a military path, and any person in sound mind would always opt for a diplomatic path, because this person would know that even if it's difficult, but still, the diplomatic path would allow to save hundreds of thousands or even millions of lives, and this is not something that I would be willing to have, and any leader, despite his own willingness or desires, has no right to take a decision to not go, to not proceed with the diplomatic path. He should proceed with the diplomatic path, and we will constantly make steps with regards to the diplomatic settlement of the military conflict and the war with Russian Federation and our partners, both European partners and the United States and Canada. Now, all of them, they can see that whatever Russia is saying over those past years, claiming that it's Ukraine that is not willing to see the
Speaker 1
negotiation table.
Speaker 2
Now, everyone can see that there's this accumulating affect. Now, everyone can see that
Speaker 1
they should trust Ukraine, and there is absolutely no trust to Russia, and Russia and the trust, they are absolutely difficult words, because whenever they're
Speaker 2
talking about a
Unknown speaker
negotiation,
Speaker 1
that's the
Speaker 2
security
Speaker 1
issues. I don't remember the second part of the question. I'm not afraid of
Speaker 2
having a meeting with President Putin if
Speaker 1
we're talking about
Speaker 2
the attempts to kill me. Let's just wait
Speaker 1
for a second.
Speaker 2
I don't have a right to be afraid
Speaker 1
of,
Unknown speaker
because
Speaker 1
our
Speaker 2
people have
Speaker 1
proved
Speaker 2
that
Speaker 1
they're afraid of nothing.
Speaker 2
Well, they are afraid
Speaker 1
of their
Speaker 2
children, but still they stop the Russian tanks with their bare hands, just the same as our armed forces and our national guard personnel. There's a lot of
Unknown speaker
people.
Speaker 2
But anyway, now you're sure that you are in safety. So the normal leader, ordinary leader
Speaker 1
has
Speaker 2
no right to be afraid when the question has to do with our country, with our independence. Now, CGTN, if I pronounced that correctly, the fourth row, please.
Speaker 7
CGTN. So, Mr. President, you've reiterated your readiness for peace talks with Russia. We know that UN Secretary General Antonio Gloris is visiting Moscow and Kiev. We also noticed some reports talking about the U.S. and its allies have centered on the weapons, how to ship the weapons to your country. But at the same time, we know that the Moscow thinks that your continuous appeal for military support from NATO countries would not be helpful for the negotiations. Can you comment on that?
Unknown speaker
Thanks.
Speaker 2
I'm sorry. Can you please repeat the beginning of your question?
Speaker 1
From the very beginning, if you can.
Speaker 7
Sure, of course. I think you are talking about your readiness for peace talks with Russia. We know that UN Secretary General is coming to Moscow and Kiev to promote the ceasefire or peace. At the same time, we know some reports talking about the U.S. and its allies have centered on weapons, how to ship the weapons to your country. And Moscow thinks that your continuous appeal for military support from NATO countries is adding fuel to the fire and can be seen as a deterrent to negotiations. Can you comment on this? Thank you so much.
Speaker 2
Thank you for this question. First of all, we'll be welcoming the Secretary General who will arrive to Kiev. We'll have negotiations. I believe that we have made a lot of steps to change even his position, to have his position being reinforced with regards to the support to Ukraine. I had a number of personal meetings with him and I told him that you can't have a balance in between of your relations with Ukraine and Russia. We expect 100 percent support from the Secretary
Speaker 1
General of UN because
Speaker 2
we are the righteous. It is on our territory that the war is coming. If the Secretary General of the UN will have a
Speaker 1
time,
Unknown speaker
he
Speaker 1
would definitely need to visit some of these
Speaker 2
settlements where the tortures were happening, where our people were being killed. And only then the Secretary General would need to find the time
Speaker 1
to be spent in
Speaker 2
Moscow. I believe that
Speaker 1
it's
Speaker 2
more important
Speaker 1
to understand what is happening in Ukraine in order to have all the
Speaker 2
arguments while having conversations in Moscow. Because if you simply arrive to Kiev just to talk, this is not enough. I believe that first and foremost one would need to understand what is happening in Kiev. That's why many leaders, both the Chancellor of Austria, I always suggested them whenever they would be going to Moscow, they would need to first come to Kiev
Speaker 1
if
Speaker 2
that's not about political tourism, if that's about the support, the true support. And maybe
Speaker 4
if
Speaker 2
you would
Speaker 4
be able to see that,
Speaker 2
then his points
Speaker 4
with regards
Speaker 2
to Russia and Ukraine would be more reinforced. Speaking about the supply of weapons to Ukraine, we are definitely not interested in these thoughts of Russian Federation. In the beginning of the war, they also supplied this. You remember in the beginning of their aggression, they were on the retreat and they left a lot of tanks behind themselves. So I'm grateful
Speaker 4
for them today.
Unknown speaker
Now,
Speaker 2
somewhere in the end, in the final rows, just a couple of days on the 27th of April, Russia has announced their plans on conducting a referendum in Kherson. And based on the experience of 2014, how it all happened in Donbas, it doesn't matter how many people will come, they will draw any result they want. What the Ukraine would do if this pseudo-referendum will be conducted, if they will proclaim the establishment of the Kherson People's Republic, what this would mean for our negotiations? Because the people in Kherson, they are pro-Ukrainian and they don't understand what Ukraine will do after this situation. Thank you for this question.
Speaker 1
If our
Speaker 2
people
Speaker 1
in Mariupol will be killed,
Unknown speaker
if
Speaker 1
there will
Speaker 2
be a pseudo-referendum
Speaker 1
on the
Speaker 2
establishment of a new pseudo-referendum, people's republic, Ukraine will not continue
Speaker 1
negotiating. But our citizens located on the temporarily
Speaker 2
occupied territories of the Kherson region, but
Speaker 1
in
Speaker 2
many other settlements in the Zaporizhzhia region and in the east of Ukraine, they have to know and they should not assist the
Speaker 1
occupying forces. And I
Speaker 2
know
Speaker 1
because of the
Speaker 2
intelligence and because of ordinary
Speaker 1
people who live there, I can't say that they have pro-Ukrainian position, they have a Ukrainian position. These are the Ukrainians who are passing the facts, they are gathering
Speaker 2
these or that
Speaker 1
data. And I believe this is, this would definitely
Speaker 2
not facilitate the diplomatic settlement of this conflict. This would definitely prevent this war from stopping in a diplomatic way. This is definitely the wrong step made by the Russians. This means that everything that was before that, all those
Speaker 1
meetings of the diplomatic groups
Speaker 2
or teams is just a fiction.
Speaker 4
And this is just a theater with very bad actors.
Speaker 2
Okay, now, Imedi from Georgia. If you want if I pronounce that correctly from the fourth row,
Unknown speaker
please.
Speaker 8
Mr. President, as a citizen of Georgia and as a journalist, of course, I want to thank you because we Georgians believe that your struggle is our struggle and your victory will be the most valuable for our region to be the democracy. Now I want to ask you, also here, our soldiers died in the land of Ukraine for our democracy. How you see, what is your view of this thinking, our perspective in European Union, how you see friendship of Georgia, and also Georgian people are very worried about some details. When will it be possible to return ambassador of Ukraine in Georgia because mostly who really want not to be a friend is Russia, you know. Thank you, Imedi. Thank
Speaker 1
you
Speaker 2
for the question. Well, from a friendly Georgia,
Speaker 1
I believe that one
Speaker 2
of the closest are the people of Georgia to the people of Ukraine. That's historically, that's from the
Speaker 1
very first
Speaker 2
revolution that we saw the
Speaker 1
great support from the Georgian people.
Speaker 2
And even now,
Speaker 1
when we
Speaker 2
didn't
Speaker 1
understand,
Speaker 2
and frankly speaking,
Speaker 1
and I believe
Speaker 2
that I can
Speaker 1
be talking frankly to
Speaker 2
the Georgians because we are truly
Speaker 1
brothering
Speaker 2
people, brother nations, and I truly don't understand the positions of the leaders of your country. I do not understand this position. It was
Speaker 1
something that
Speaker 2
felt very painful. And what they are doing is not worth it. I mean, not imposing these sanctions. These are
Speaker 1
just minor issues.
Speaker 2
Despite the
Speaker 1
kilometers,
Speaker 2
the distance in
Speaker 1
between us,
Speaker 2
we
Speaker 1
are close neighbors.
Unknown speaker
We
Speaker 2
are closer than with Russia. And we don't want to have any conflicts with Georgia. And I'm sure and confident that there will never be a conflict in between our nations. And when Georgian people went on their streets, when the whole people, the police went on their streets, when I called, when your people called for the response,
Speaker 1
and some of your people gave their lives, and they
Speaker 2
provided support. There were a lot of vulnerabilities over the past years, beginning with the revolution and the
Speaker 1
beginning of war in 2014. But I cannot understand the behavior. I'm not a
Speaker 2
teacher and your leaders are not peoples. They are adult people. And I don't understand what is the reason.
Speaker 1
Not implementing the
Speaker 2
sanctions.
Speaker 1
They've heard messages like
Speaker 2
that.
Speaker 1
We have to
Speaker 2
protect
Speaker 1
our
Speaker 2
economy.
Speaker 1
What economy?
Speaker 2
They've taken part of the territory of Georgia. They have reached almost the poorest of Tbilisi. What economy are you talking about?
Speaker 9
So I do think. But I'm really sure. I'm sure. Yeah, please. Exactly.
Speaker 8
We speak very loudly in political fields, in everywhere, in NATO, in European Union also, and every group. My question is about the ambassador in Georgia and also how you see our perspective in European Union together.
Speaker 1
You must see your own perspective in the
Speaker 9
European
Speaker 1
Union. You must see it,
Speaker 9
observe it.
Speaker 1
I know that people
Speaker 9
want, they do want.
Speaker 1
But
Speaker 9
this is not the
Unknown speaker
case.
Speaker 9
I'm pretty sure that you will be there in the European Union, a part of the family or in the NATO where you want to. It's your decision. It's up to you. And Ukraine will always respect your choice. Always. I can tell it clearly from behalf of all of us.
Unknown speaker
But
Speaker 9
your answers are inside your country. That's how it seems to me. Speaking about the returning of the ambassador, well…
Speaker 1
We will definitely bring the
Speaker 9
ambassador back to friendly Georgia. When
Speaker 1
we
Speaker 9
feel the support provided to Ukraine by the leaders of your government. By your leaders. Thank you.
Speaker 4
Thank you. We
Speaker 9
have CNN. Fifth row, I guess. The left side.
Speaker 10
Mr. President, Phil Black from CNN. Could you please give us your assessment of Russia's plans but also its capabilities for its operations in the east, in the Donbass? Will Russia or perhaps more importantly, can Russia launch a large scale push to break through your defensive lines or is this looming as a slower, longer, grinding military operation? And secondly, do you believe your allies are finally getting the message? Are they sending you the heavy weapons you need? Thank you.
Speaker 9
Thank you. Thank you so much. First of all,
Speaker 1
I'd
Speaker 9
like to give you an example of Kiev and Kiev region. Let's use it as an example. Which had been occupied and they almost reached Kiev, the very brink of Kiev.
Speaker 8
We
Speaker 9
had so many battles close to Kiev but we deoccupied the territory. We freed the territory. My position, my personal position,
Unknown speaker
my
Speaker 1
human position
Speaker 9
and
Speaker 1
position of a president. Everything that they will try
Speaker 9
to break
Speaker 1
and if
Speaker 9
they, God forbid, occupy
Speaker 1
something, we'll bring it back. It will be not a
Speaker 9
matter
Speaker 1
of 10 years or 20
Speaker 9
years,
Speaker 1
not a war like we have it starting from 2014. It will be a war that we have this war for eight years. Concerning
Speaker 9
the armament, if we have it, if we have enough of it, we will return it immediately. We will take our territories back immediately, the temporarily occupied ones. This is the war that we have right now in Ukraine. This is the situation in the eastern regions, in Kharkiv region. Every
Speaker 1
day
Speaker 9
we can
Speaker 1
unfortunately give due to the capacity of certain Russian groups, we can give a piece of territory. But during the
Speaker 9
night time,
Speaker 1
on the next day, we bring it back,
Speaker 9
small
Speaker 1
towns, small villages and we move forward.
Speaker 9
We don't move forward in the places where we
Speaker 1
can't, where we
Speaker 9
simply have
Speaker 1
no
Speaker 9
support that we talk about. We've been talking
Speaker 1
so long about this support and
Speaker 9
we
Speaker 1
talk about this support in
Speaker 9
public for quite a long time. We present it everywhere. With non-public channels, just to be frank, we also use the non-public channels. I'm speaking about the change regarding our Western partners. We can see the shift, especially I can see the change in the speed
Speaker 1
of
Speaker 9
response, especially the US response. And if this speed
Speaker 1
will grow,
Speaker 9
just like they promised us, if they do it like they promised, if their steps will coincide
Speaker 1
the words like
Speaker 9
any
Speaker 1
decent
Speaker 9
person should,
Speaker 1
then yes.
Speaker 9
And
Speaker 1
for any
Speaker 9
leader, that's important to be a decent
Speaker 1
person. And then we will do
Speaker 9
it
Speaker 1
faster. We will free our
Speaker 9
territories.
Speaker 1
In the Western regions, at
Speaker 9
any moment, something may
Speaker 1
happen like you mentioned. For example,
Speaker 9
in Mariupol
Speaker 1
right now,
Speaker 9
at this specific moment, at
Speaker 1
this second, they're on
Speaker 9
the siege. It's one of the hardest
Speaker 1
days today. The preparation, they
Speaker 9
shoot from the sea.
Speaker 1
We
Speaker 9
have the shell fire on the
Speaker 1
land,
Speaker 9
everywhere, tanks, artillery systems, everything they can use, jets. I got the last message, like they want to prepare such, an hour ago I got the last message from the guys who stay there. I know what they are planning to do. When we will be able to go there, we will be there. But so far,
Speaker 1
we offer again, like any civilized person should, we
Speaker 9
offer the humanitarian solution,
Speaker 1
purely humanitarian solution for this
Speaker 9
issue.
Speaker 1
Exchange, we offer to exchange civilians in Mariupol, take them back,
Speaker 9
to exchange for injured
Speaker 1
people, for wounded. We
Speaker 9
don't offer the deceased. Unfortunately, we have people who died there. But they left their people. They left Russians there. But we want to bring our killed people out of there. We don't want to leave our people. And of course, exchange of military, protecting Mariupol. We are ready for it as well.
Speaker 1
We offered that. And why, for example,
Speaker 9
why I had this very sharp response provided at the press conference,
Speaker 1
like the Russia
Speaker 9
told something like the ball is on your side, or something like this. This is not true. Again, I want to underline.
Speaker 1
We offered any
Speaker 9
kind
Speaker 1
of format of exchange to get our people out
Speaker 9
of
Speaker 1
there. Staying in this hell,
Unknown speaker
in
Speaker 1
this monstrous situation is
Speaker 9
such a bloody, in
Speaker 1
a
Speaker 9
sea of blood. And when the President of the Russian Federation recently, I was shown his message, like he gives the conference,
Speaker 1
that
Speaker 9
the only fortress left, but we will not attack.
Speaker 1
And after this in two
Speaker 9
hours, an air raid.
Speaker 1
So the question is, it's about pragmatic dialogue. It's
Speaker 9
not about trust. It's pragmatic dialogue. Thank you. Thank
Speaker 1
you.
Speaker 9
The third row,
Unknown speaker
please.
Speaker 9
I'm presenting Ukraine. So Mr. President, I have two questions. First is more precise. Well, concerning the aggressor's
Speaker 1
requirements and
Speaker 9
demands. So up to
Speaker 1
now,
Unknown speaker
at
Speaker 9
this moment, what are their key requests? What do they want again? Like, okay, recognizing these fake entities, whatever. Maybe they already refused from something
Speaker 1
during this, during the
Speaker 9
hostilities because they failed humanitarian issues or language, what they call denazification. I don't know. That is actually. What is the pool of requests and requirements? The second is more general question. Regardless of how the events take place, like, let's say, within the nearest days or weeks, you as a president, how do you think? Do Ukrainian, are Ukrainian people ready to live in years or decades
Speaker 1
in this, in
Speaker 9
this state like the Israeli people live? A militarist country where children have their algebra lesson, then they study how to handle the rifles or where
Speaker 11
everyone
Speaker 9
have to actually take a couple of years of military service. Are Ukrainians ready to exist like
Speaker 10
this?
Speaker 9
As we have this threat from the Russian Federation. Sorry for that long question. I'll start from the second part. Thank you. So, look, this is not an issue of are you ready or not. I think all Ukrainians, especially all of those who are in the country, who are staying right now physically, are not saying, I'm not mentioning women and children. We have even some men who appear to be a little bit more feminine than they should have. So the majority of Ukrainians, our people, more than 90 percent, I'm so happy that we have such a state. I'm truly, I'm
Speaker 1
just, I'm flattered with it. They're not just ready or
Speaker 9
not ready. We have no
Speaker 1
other choice. We will be this state.
Speaker 9
We will become it. We already are becoming it. We have become it.
Speaker 1
I can tell you, we already
Speaker 9
are there. We are
Speaker 1
the state
Speaker 9
that you
Speaker 1
mentioned. We are the state. We have to know and we
Speaker 9
know that we
Speaker 1
have to defend our land and
Speaker 9
we will defend it.
Speaker 1
It doesn't mean that we
Speaker 9
will
Speaker 1
dive
Speaker 9
into hostilities.
Speaker 1
When
Speaker 9
we finally
Speaker 1
win, we will be the state
Speaker 9
with the
Speaker 1
best army, the most experienced one. People
Speaker 9
who are very well experienced in how to protect themselves will be one of the strongest nations in Europe. Again, not because we are so special or unique, but I do think that we are special. But this is subjective opinion. Again, this is my personal opinion. But because we have no other choice. This is the reality we wake up in. This is the reality that we live in. We have the neighbor. That's it. So this is the second part. The first part. Regarding the requests and demands from the Russian Federation.
Speaker 1
Well, first, as we know from the media and thanks, let's say, to other institutions, we got some ultimatums. Some very sharp requests. Not about negotiations. But
Speaker 9
pure demands. They say Ukraine has to or is obliged to. It's not about dialogue. So first it was like a very, very
Speaker 1
clear demand and order.
Speaker 9
And
Speaker 1
then
Speaker 9
the text started changing. The wording was
Speaker 1
changed.
Speaker 9
And
Speaker 1
then
Speaker 9
they saw that we are united. The state is united. We demonstrated our unity from the very first days of war. They saw it. They observed it. And in a couple of days we saw that
Speaker 1
this ultimate
Speaker 9
request,
Speaker 1
like they just, we saw this in their
Speaker 9
messages from Russian Federation.
Speaker 1
Some pieces
Speaker 9
vanished
Speaker 1
out of there.
Speaker 9
Then the negotiations of the subgroups started.
Speaker 1
And then they reached,
Speaker 9
we all know what they managed to reach.
Speaker 1
So there was a note prepared in
Speaker 9
Turkey. And as
Speaker 1
far as I know, Russian
Speaker 9
Federation
Speaker 1
first
Speaker 9
positively responded to
Speaker 1
that note, to that document. And then inside the country it
Speaker 9
was
Speaker 1
heavily criticized because it
Speaker 9
appeared to
Speaker 1
be that not only the government,
Speaker 9
well, the
Speaker 1
government
Speaker 9
actually brainwashed their people. The government didn't expect to get that kind of critique, you know, because they have such a hatred to Ukraine, not just within the government, not just the leaders, but they nurtured their people to hate us. They made their people hating us thanks to controlled, fully controlled by Kremlin, media fully controlled by Kremlin. And they were surprised so much later of how strong the hatred is to Ukrainians inside the Russian Federation. And I know that they provided certain messages like the answers to our notes, to our documents, to
Speaker 1
our requests. And
Speaker 9
with these
Speaker 1
answers, our subgroups,
Speaker 9
they
Speaker 1
do work with it.
Speaker 9
Just to give a brief answer to your
Speaker 1
question, I do think that the most urgent issue is of course the guarantee of security and neutrality. The Donbass destiny and Crimea, of course.
Speaker 9
No more issues are there. No more issues exist. So everything else is purely just, you
Speaker 4
know,
Speaker 9
it's just purely political. Thank you. IBC News in like the very end next to the central aisle, please.
Speaker 12
Thank you for taking my question. My name is Marcus Moore. I'm with ABC News out of the United States. And you mentioned your openness to meeting with Vladimir Putin. If you could speak to him right now, what would you tell him? And my second question, in reference to the military aid that you're getting from the United States, are you pleased with the equipment that you are getting, not only for the short term, but for the long term, if this conflict drags on? Thank you.
Speaker 1
Again, I want
Speaker 9
to
Speaker 1
tell how grateful we are.
Unknown speaker
A
Speaker 9
profound gratitude.
Speaker 1
We are grateful for the support provided by two chambers and
Speaker 9
American chambers.
Speaker 1
We even get more than maybe… Well, we can't say no to anything we are provided. We speak about the best military support, and this is
Speaker 9
American
Speaker 1
support and British support. We have many other friends, European friends, but of course you recognize fully. I speak about the scope of this aid, and I'm fully grateful for it. Also, USA
Speaker 9
are the leaders.
Speaker 1
This is the country who is the leader, and they
Speaker 9
set the tone.
Speaker 1
They actually set the tone for any negotiation, and they set the tone for this dynamics of support, and they affect quite often if any European country can provide armament, they actually can change the situation. This is a very important strategic partner, and I do believe in this strategic partnership, but I really want everything to go faster, to move faster.
Speaker 9
Concerning the
Speaker 1
politics, yes,
Speaker 9
I do support
Speaker 1
us,
Unknown speaker
and
Speaker 1
personally, well, I will not reveal a big
Speaker 9
secret. I don't
Speaker 1
know if
Speaker 9
anybody knows, but tomorrow we are about to have some American people here. The Minister of Defense will be here, and the State Secretary of the United States of America, Mr. Blinken, I'll have a meeting with him, and they actually are about to arrive. So we'll
Speaker 1
expect…
Speaker 9
We are waiting for the security situation to allow Mr. Biden to come as well, just to support Ukrainian people. Tomorrow we will have this conversation, and we'll talk about that armament list that we need, about the equipment that we need, and the terms of provision.
Speaker 1
Again, I
Speaker 9
want to underline,
Speaker 1
as I think,
Speaker 9
the last week, signals, the messages
Speaker 1
from
Speaker 9
the
Speaker 1
last week,
Speaker 9
the terms, the
Speaker 1
amount, the scope. I speak about military
Speaker 9
equipment and armament
Speaker 1
from the
Speaker 9
United States.
Speaker 1
It's improving,
Speaker 9
and it has
Speaker 1
improved, and I'm so
Speaker 9
grateful for it, and this is
Speaker 1
something that
Speaker 9
we
Speaker 1
really expect
Speaker 9
to
Speaker 1
get, something that we
Unknown speaker
want.
Speaker 9
We really
Speaker 1
want to
Speaker 9
have… Of course, we have wonderful soldiers, but we want to have this heavy armament and strong armament. Azerbaijan, New Journalist, please, the second row. Please take a microphone. So Azerbaijan, Baku TV, Agents Report. How would you evaluate the mediation of Turkey, the role of Turkey as a mediator in this process, in the negotiation process? And again, how do you evaluate the role of Azerbaijan in this situation, in this war, and before the war, your military always evaluated very highly the experience of our soldiers, of our military in the Karabakh war. So can they use actually this experience in the Russian-Ukrainian war? We do love Azerbaijan. Thank you. Let's just piece by piece, okay? You have so many questions, and I have a very small stomach, anyway.
Unknown speaker
Okay.
Speaker 9
Let's just… How would you evaluate Turkey and Azerbaijan as mediators in the negotiation process? How do you evaluate Azerbaijan in this situation as a whole? Not negotiation, but I mean as a whole. The Russian-Ukrainian war and the negotiation process. And okay. That takes time. So before the war, your military highly appreciated the experience of Azerbaijani army during the second Karabakh war, and now your army actually… Does your army use our experience while fighting with Russia?
Unknown speaker
Yeah,
Speaker 9
okay. Let's just limit ourselves to three. Okay, the very last one. How do you evaluate the role of Bayraktar in this war as a military equipment? The Bayraktar's role.
Unknown speaker
Okay.
Speaker 1
You
Speaker 9
have very interesting questions and very intriguing questions, I'd say.
Speaker 1
Thank you. Thank you so much for
Speaker 9
the questions. I'll do it like that.
Speaker 1
So how do I evaluate the mission of
Speaker 9
Turkey and Azerbaijan
Speaker 1
and their
Speaker 9
role in the negotiation process? Well,
Speaker 1
I'd
Speaker 9
be very frank. The dialogue
Speaker 1
with
Speaker 9
both
Speaker 1
presidents regarding the
Speaker 9
mediation. Well, I had these
Speaker 1
dialogues with
Speaker 9
both
Speaker 1
of them. I had several moments.
Speaker 9
We have very good relations with Turkey and Azerbaijan both in the negotiation process. I would separate this a little bit because Turkey, in Turkey right now, well, we have these diplomatic missions taking place of our subgroups. I mean, Turkey shows and
Speaker 1
demonstrates that
Speaker 9
this country wants to be a leader
Speaker 1
among
Speaker 9
the countries
Speaker 1
stepping
Speaker 9
out with this mediation role.
Speaker 1
Turkey openly
Speaker 9
expresses its statement, gives a statement that it wants
Speaker 1
to
Speaker 9
be among
Speaker 1
the
Speaker 9
guarantors. We say
Speaker 1
it, yeah, the guarantors. The security guarantors. And I
Speaker 9
haven't
Speaker 1
received that message from
Speaker 9
Azerbaijan
Speaker 1
yet, but
Speaker 9
President Aliyev always supported Ukraine. I know it. And he supports us. We have humanitarian aid, medical support. And I think that
Speaker 1
it's, okay,
Speaker 9
it's hard for me to use Russian. So from
Speaker 1
this,
Speaker 9
yeah,
Speaker 1
when we speak about weapons, I think
Speaker 9
that for Azerbaijan today
Speaker 1
it's really hard
Speaker 9
when it comes to provision
Speaker 1
of
Speaker 9
weapons. It's hard to support Ukraine. It's pretty clear. We can understand this because you have Nagorno-Karabakh. You have this issue. It's still there. It's a very painful historical issue. I understand this. And I can tell
Speaker 1
you
Speaker 9
that this is one of not so many countries, I mean, Azerbaijan. We understand you. We actually understand what you're coming through. And we know what your experience is. And this neutrality balance, we don't understand it.
Unknown speaker
I
Speaker 1
understand. Well, I
Speaker 9
know why. Because right now the war may just explode and break out. I know. But we expect to get more. Someday we will stop understanding because we are coming through very complicated times. Every day, yes, every day people are dying. So you have to understand this. But we have very good relations.
Speaker 2
Now the role of the Bayraktar UAVs. Bayraktar is our drones.
Speaker 1
And as
Speaker 2
you know,
Speaker 1
we
Speaker 2
have this joint production. And we already have some of the drones that were jointly produced. We're supplying the engines for the drones. And there's a lot of them. We are using these UAVs. But with all due respect to Bayraktar and any other military equipment,
Speaker 1
I
Speaker 2
need to honestly say that this is a different war. And I'll answer another question of yours about the experience. That's another war. That's a different one. And all the experts say that this is an incomparable war. It could not be compared to any single war in the 21st century. It couldn't be compared with the wars of the 1990s. It was nothing like that. These are the weapons or the drones. They can assist. But they have no impact on the final result because the history of missiles, artillery, and air defense. This is what plays a crucial role. And not a single war that was waged by Russia on the territory of other independent countries. There was not the level of destruction that it caused in Ukraine. They've used so many heavy armament and equipment. And there was no tortures. There
Speaker 1
was no
Speaker 2
attempts of great pain that we made. That was not something that happened on the territory of Ukraine. And God hope it will not happen on the territory of other countries.
Unknown speaker
And
Speaker 1
it
Speaker 2
happened so that it is for Ukraine to stop all this. And that is why your countries would need to help us more. Remember, there's this saying, when they will finish with the Ukrainians, if they will finish with the Ukrainians, they will pick up someone
Speaker 4
else. One
Speaker 2
plus one, the fifth row, please. Volodymyr Oleksandrovich, after this small break, I have to go back to the very important question. I'm sure that it's very painful to hear that the situation around the city of Mariupol. We've all seen the video from the basements of Azov Steel, where the children have stayed underground for 55 days. They are running out of food, as the authorities considering a way of a military de-blocking of the city. Is there any deadline? Because the people located in the Azov Steel, they're running out of weapons, ammunition, and food. So as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the country, what would you be able to
Speaker 1
respond?
Speaker 2
Look,
Speaker 1
I'm
Speaker 2
not ready
Speaker 1
to
Speaker 2
tell you
Speaker 1
everything that I'm talking
Speaker 2
to them
Speaker 1
as the President as the Commander-in-Chief. And we have a
Speaker 2
direct contact
Speaker 1
with the people on the ground. And I can tell you, these are our cities. These
Speaker 2
are our citizens. That's why we have all the right, all the moral right to use military efforts to de-block our cities. And we have high hope
Speaker 1
that we
Speaker 2
will be
Speaker 1
able to do that.
Speaker 2
Whether we are ready to do that now,
Speaker 1
no.
Speaker 2
Do not trust anyone about the military de-blocking of Mariupol. We're not preparing that at this moment.
Speaker 1
And
Speaker 2
those
Speaker 1
soldiers that are defending
Speaker 2
that part of the Mariupol city,
Speaker 1
the Azov
Speaker 2
Steel who
Speaker 1
are blocked,
Speaker 2
the leaders, the commanders, they clearly understand this. That's a reality. We can proceed. Sky News, please, of the fourth row.
Speaker 13
Deborah Haynes from Sky News. You said that you're willing to speak with Vladimir Putin if there's a chance to find a diplomatic path to peace. But given all that your country has been through, would you ultimately like to see Vladimir Putin before a war crimes tribunal? And given that you've got the US Defense Secretary coming into town on Sunday and the Secretary of State, and you've talked about the importance of weapons from the US and the UK coming quickly, can you, speaking frankly, set out the danger for Ukraine if your allies, like the UK, like the US, stop sending weapons so fast? Is there a chance that Russia will take land and seize and hold land in the east, in the south, and maybe even come back to Kiev?
Speaker 1
Speaking about the
Speaker 2
meeting with the President Putin, you said
Speaker 1
that you expressed willingness. It's not that I'm expressing the willingness. It's
Speaker 2
that I need
Speaker 1
to
Speaker 2
have this meeting should we are
Speaker 1
willing to
Speaker 2
have a diplomatic settlement. Speaking about this war crime tribunal, it's not that I'm willing.
Speaker 1
It's
Speaker 2
all of them will face war crime tribunal, all those who issued orders to murder children, women, everyone. I'm confident in that. I believe in that. We know how the international process is happening. We know how the International Criminal Court is having its sessions.
Speaker 1
It takes years,
Speaker 2
but we
Speaker 1
will wait. And if those like me will not face that, then our children will wait
Speaker 2
for that,
Speaker 1
will face it. That
Speaker 2
will
Speaker 1
be a final nail
Speaker 2
in the
Speaker 1
policy
Speaker 2
of that country. Speaking
Speaker 1
about the…
Speaker 2
Look, I'm not considering an option that our partners would not be providing us the weapons that they've promised about. This is not something that I'm considering.
Speaker 1
There is no alternative. We will not give them this opportunity. We don't have other chances but to liberate our territories because there is
Speaker 2
no other option.
Speaker 1
There would
Speaker 2
be no doubt. That's the alternative. And I do not consider such alternative.
Speaker 4
Thank you. Now, TVP, in the very end to the left.
Speaker 14
Good
Speaker 2
afternoon, dear President, and thank you for finding the time for
Speaker 14
us.
Speaker 2
I was asked by my friends from Poland to express all the best wishes from Poland. Everyone is supporting you from Poland. So, the question from my friends of Polish people, we heard a lot that you are in Warsaw, and Russians tried to persuade everyone that you are in Warsaw. Everyone was looking for you in Warsaw, but we are keeping to have this meeting in Kiev. So, question, would you like to come to Warsaw? Okay.
Speaker 1
Look,
Speaker 2
I kept receiving
Speaker 1
a lot of questions whether I would like to
Speaker 2
go
Speaker 1
somewhere.
Speaker 2
Like, I don't have a right. And honestly speaking, I don't want. And I highly respect Poland, your friends and I highly respect the President of Poland and to the people of Poland. You have welcomed,
Speaker 1
you have extended
Speaker 2
hospitality to over 2.5 million of Ukrainians. That's a special attention, that's a special attitude of helping
Speaker 1
the
Speaker 2
country in the time
Speaker 1
of difficulties.
Speaker 2
So, I would like to really extend the words of gratitude because they are truly a very friendly and safe neighbors in Ukraine, and I'm sure that this is for many years and for serious.
Speaker 1
Look, I've visited
Speaker 2
Poland many times. I've had meetings with the President Adjiduda. I'm always happy to visit Poland. I'm not feeling myself as if I'm at home in Poland. I'm sorry for that. I only feel myself at home
Speaker 9
when I'm
Speaker 2
in Ukraine. But there's something that makes me
Speaker 1
feel very willing to go to Poland.
Speaker 2
That's
Speaker 1
this friendly attitude of Polish people to Ukraine. So, I'm grateful for this
Speaker 2
support. That was not only the humanitarian support and since the relationship with the President of Poland, both from the point of weapons and he always supported us. Well, of course, I'm a person like that. I cannot just say words of gratitude. I have to say something more.
Unknown speaker
But
Speaker 15
there is one
Speaker 1
thing
Speaker 15
that
Speaker 1
still
Speaker 2
raises in the air. There's only done for us. That's not
Speaker 1
really. I'm sure that
Speaker 2
until the war is in progress, I simply don't have the right to go to Poland. Republic of India, that's in the center, please.
Speaker 16
India mentioned about the new world order. Mr. President, do you believe that the world order has changed? In the face of this kind of aggression, do you believe a new alliance of countries is needed?
Speaker 17
I just wanted to ask you, what is it that you as the President of this country is expecting from the Asian countries? And was there any point in time in the first phase of the war that you felt let down by the Western partners?
Speaker 16
Thank you.
Speaker 1
Well, thank
Speaker 2
you for
Speaker 1
this question.
Speaker 2
Now, speaking on
Speaker 1
the world order or the security infrastructure, I cannot have an impact on
Speaker 2
the alliance. We are not a member state of NATO, even though I believe that's a major mistake that NATO over all these years have not found the time and place to have Ukraine as
Speaker 1
a member state. And everyone can see that we would be able to reinforce their capabilities. And everyone can already see
Speaker 2
that
Speaker 1
that
Speaker 2
would have a highly probable impact on Russia for not having this war. And I talked about this with the Secretary General's name too, and I talked with the leaders of the major European countries. I'm not going to name all those countries. We've only started this frank conversation maybe somewhere
Speaker 1
later, but in NATO, in the alliance, and in the European
Speaker 2
Union. And I believe that this was a strategic mistake made by the alliance with regards to Ukraine.
Speaker 1
And nobody counted on our resilience and strength.
Speaker 2
Nobody believed that we would be able to defend for three days or more. Some leaders of the European countries were not willing to impose sanctions
Speaker 1
because
Speaker 2
they said there's no sense
Speaker 1
of imposing sanctions since
Speaker 2
they will be occupied in three days. So that was a mistake. That was a mistake at the level of attitude to
Speaker 1
this country. But
Speaker 2
through our unity, through our strength, through the repelment of Russian attacks, we've managed to change the attitude of the European countries, of the alliance, and many others. We've managed to change their attitude to us. And I want the Asian countries, I want them to change their attitude to Ukraine just to say
Speaker 1
whether
Speaker 2
I feel that
Speaker 1
they've changed it. No. Whether they've truly changed it. Well, the people of
Speaker 2
those countries have truly changed their attitude. They know us. And I feel that the leaders of those countries are
Speaker 1
close to the change of
Speaker 2
their position. And historically, they were very close to the Soviet Union. And that's why historically, after the disbandment of the Soviet Union, they remained close to the Russian Federation as the inheritance of the Soviet Union and the larger, largest country of the former Soviet Union. So they have this tight relationship. But Ukraine
Speaker 1
had
Speaker 2
them
Speaker 1
rethink that.
Unknown speaker
And
Speaker 1
that's a great
Speaker 2
achievement
Speaker 1
of
Speaker 2
our country.
Speaker 1
But it's
Speaker 2
already an achievement of their leaders
Speaker 1
as
Speaker 2
they're
Speaker 1
listening to
Speaker 2
us. And it's a very difficult task. Both
Speaker 1
the Asian culture and the African culture, they were close to
Speaker 2
the
Speaker 1
same. There
Speaker 2
is an end to
Speaker 1
many things.
Speaker 2
And that's a partial answer
Speaker 1
to
Speaker 2
your first question with
Speaker 1
regards to the global security infrastructure. Now, all the leaders
Speaker 2
of the
Speaker 1
countries in Asia and Africa,
Speaker 2
they can see that
Speaker 1
not a
Speaker 2
single country can
Speaker 1
be allowed to violate the global order. You cannot take the territory of other countries. You can impose your
Speaker 2
own
Speaker 1
rules on other countries. And on the other continents, this could not be allowed. Now, everyone is afraid of that.
Unknown speaker
Now,
Speaker 2
look at the challenge, look
Speaker 1
at the challenge
Speaker 2
to
Speaker 1
the African
Speaker 2
countries, to the Arab countries about this blocking of supply of grain, barley, corn
Speaker 1
from Ukraine. I mean, we were the leading exporter of those agricultural products. 20 million tons of grain, that's more than enough to support the Ukrainian market. And
Speaker 2
then there's 90 million
Speaker 1
of tons. This is something
Speaker 2
that has not been supplied to the other countries. And in some countries, there will be a deficit. In some countries, there will be a problem with the food supplies. Now, that's why everyone can see that the war in Ukraine, it's not about only about Ukraine, but because of blocking the food products from being exported. This is not only a war in Europe, but a war in other continents
Speaker 1
because of these steps, because of disrespect to all the living, this is a
Speaker 2
disrespect to the international law and legislation of these countries. Because of these societies, they make
Speaker 15
the leaders
Speaker 2
start to listen. I'm sure that Prime Minister Modi, and I had a meeting with him once, and we had several conversations with him on the environmental forum. I think I met him in Glasgow,
Speaker 1
and
Speaker 2
then we had a number of conversations over the phone, I think two conversations.
Speaker 1
And
Speaker 2
I truly feel that the people and the leaders, and I believe he is a true leader of the largest democratic country in the world. I believe that they can
Speaker 1
see that you need to fight for every step. You need
Speaker 2
to fight for the
Speaker 4
democracy.
Speaker 2
Now, Anadolu, in the very end, to the right. Thank you, Mr. President.
Speaker 10
What do
Speaker 4
you think?
Speaker 10
Would there
Speaker 2
be a chance to continue negotiations in Turkey?
Unknown speaker
Oh,
Speaker 2
you're from Turkey. And you speak Russian.
Speaker 10
So
Speaker 2
is there a chance that you can continue negotiations in Turkey?
Speaker 9
Well, I think it's the question to another Vladimir, I mean Vladimir with another surname. So if he actually wishes, that Vladimir, if he wishes, everything depends on his
Speaker 1
wish.
Speaker 9
The meeting of our groups depends on his wish. Just meeting for the sake of meeting, we love Turkey, but it's war, and it's not about any kind of war. It's definitely not about visiting resorts, and we don't have that kind of mood.
Speaker 1
I'm sorry, you can
Speaker 9
see that even we
Speaker 1
have Easter
Speaker 9
today, but this is a big religious holiday,
Unknown speaker
a
Speaker 9
huge family
Speaker 1
holiday.
Speaker 9
It's a humane holiday. It's
Speaker 1
like a humanity
Speaker 9
holiday. Seven missiles.
Speaker 1
Seven.
Speaker 9
This is Easter time. Seven missiles we had today hitting Odessa, a big southern city, hitting Odessa. We hit two. We managed to hit two.
Speaker 1
What does it depend from? The air defense system. So seven missiles.
Speaker 9
Residential area. They hit the residential area. The multi-storeyed block of apartments. A missile hit it, just imagine it. Eight people right now, right at this specific moment.
Speaker 1
Eight people died.
Speaker 9
18 or 20 injured. A three-month newborn child died. Three-month child. Just try to grasp it. Three months old. When the war started,
Speaker 1
this child was a month old, and this
Speaker 9
child died.
Speaker 1
Just realize it, grasp it.
Speaker 9
Bastards. What I
Speaker 1
can say,
Speaker 9
these
Speaker 1
are just
Speaker 9
bloody bastards. I have no
Speaker 1
other words.
Speaker 9
I'm sorry, but bastards.
Speaker 1
Pure bastards.
Speaker 9
That's what they are.
Speaker 1
Monsters.
Speaker 9
We need
Speaker 1
to have these specific
Speaker 9
meetings. There's no satisfaction for us to stay there in the sun with these bastards. No. It's not pleasant. But we have to talk. We have to talk and finish the war. We
Speaker 1
have to talk till the very end of the
Speaker 9
war
Speaker 1
and grasp every chance,
Speaker 9
catch
Speaker 1
every chance that we have.
Speaker 9
I don't want any other three-month-old dying. It's horrifying. It's just something you can't imagine. And one of these days, they don't care. They don't
Speaker 1
think of it. What do they
Speaker 9
talk about? They talk about God. They talk about values, about their Russian world, Christian world. I
Speaker 1
don't know. It's
Speaker 9
purely medieval.
Speaker 1
It's just seven
Speaker 9
missiles for one city.
Speaker 1
They're favorite to Odessa. Russians say
Speaker 9
they
Speaker 1
love Odessa. They call Odessa
Speaker 9
mama, Odessa mother. They
Speaker 1
say,
Unknown speaker
you
Speaker 9
have wonderful cuisine in Odessa. We love to visit your city. They just want to have some food there. And that's it. Okay,
Speaker 4
let's move.
Speaker 9
I don't know how to spell it.
Speaker 15
Infobaya, I'm Roman Lehmann from
Speaker 4
Infobaya. Have you talked with Pope Francis and what do you think about his role in the conflict?
Speaker 1
Thank you, Mr. President.
Unknown speaker
Thank
Speaker 9
you. Thank you. We
Speaker 1
are grateful in
Speaker 9
general. We are grateful to Vatican.
Unknown speaker
You
Speaker 1
know,
Speaker 9
when
Speaker 1
Pope
Speaker 9
Francis
Speaker 1
actually
Speaker 9
prays and gives
Speaker 1
statements
Speaker 9
and everywhere
Speaker 1
he announces.
Speaker 9
Not
Speaker 1
just during the special days, during the holidays.
Speaker 9
He always
Speaker 1
condemns
Speaker 9
Russian
Speaker 1
aggression. He stands against it. And I'm so grateful for
Speaker 9
this
Speaker 1
position. I met
Speaker 9
him personally. We had
Speaker 1
these
Speaker 9
talks
Speaker 1
with him. And
Speaker 9
at that moment I had a chance to tell him one story. It was a story about one of our military officers. It was Markiv. He helped us and
Speaker 1
we brought our soldier
Speaker 9
back. We have to fight for each person. This is my rule, my personal rule of life. This is my motto. Fight for everyone. And I really wanted him to come from the very beginning. I just wanted him to
Speaker 1
support our people in eastern
Speaker 9
regions. I really
Speaker 1
wanted him
Speaker 9
to truly
Speaker 1
try to de-block the humanitarian corridors to Mariupol. That was
Speaker 9
the request
Speaker 1
that
Speaker 9
we gave him.
Speaker 1
We just wanted him to help us. And certain signals are there, but it's
Speaker 9
still early to say, but we expect to get
Speaker 1
him.
Speaker 9
We
Speaker 1
expect, of course, he has the mission. He
Speaker 9
has the
Speaker 1
mission from the Guard. He has a trust. He's
Speaker 9
entrusted
Speaker 1
by so many people. And I think it's important. I'm just sorry for using this word towards Vatican, but Ukraine has no choice.
Speaker 9
We
Speaker 1
have war. So we
Speaker 9
have to use.
Speaker 1
I'm sorry again for this word. I apologize, but we have to use. We have to use everything we can use. We have to use and involve any respectable
Speaker 9
and any high position person.
Speaker 1
We just need to get at least the ceasefire, the actual ceasefire, stable ceasefire, just in eastern and southern regions,
Speaker 9
just to ensure that exchange of people is taking place. So we refer to everyone, to Vatican as well.
Speaker 4
Thank
Speaker 9
you. Radar Channel in the right. Okay. So we have to use everything we can use. We have to use. So good evening, Mr. Zelensky. So we very carefully observe what the government is doing, and you announced that you created a national council, established a national council on Ukraine's refusal. What are the functions and authorities are there within this entity? Do you have any kind of list of people who will become the members of this national council? Representatives of government or the presidential office, who those
Speaker 1
will become?
Speaker 9
Thank you
Speaker 1
for the
Speaker 9
question. So it's a newly established
Speaker 1
entity, newly established
Speaker 9
institution,
Speaker 1
this council,
Speaker 9
and we
Speaker 1
have a list already of government
Speaker 9
representatives,
Speaker 1
also people from the office. Yes, I think this is
Speaker 9
not an
Speaker 1
exhaustive list. It will be extended. Why? Regarding the restoration and recovery of the country, the Ukrainian recovery program itself, it's established by us. I gave
Speaker 9
the details
Speaker 1
to European Union authorities about this program. Ursula von der Leyen supports this program
Speaker 9
completely.
Speaker 1
Charles Michel supports it as well. I'll just tell about relations and later on the content. Apart from that, we also initiated these
Speaker 9
bilateral
Speaker 1
negotiations on Ukrainian recovery with the leaders of other
Speaker 9
countries
Speaker 1
like the Great
Speaker 9
Britain,
Speaker 1
Sweden, Spain, a couple of others. For example, the Great Britain already confirmed the support provided for this program. Also, Sweden said yes
Speaker 9
to
Speaker 1
involve. This is a separate leadership. This is a program to ensure the leadership for a specific region. The Ukrainian budget is impossible to help any city or region recover. I
Speaker 9
just really want our partners to help us to restore the country. But it's not just an issue of funds. It's not just about money. It's
Speaker 1
about
Speaker 9
the patronage,
Speaker 1
taking
Speaker 9
care
Speaker 1
of any town or city. So what is patronage? What do I mean? What is this format about? It's not about just providing money, but providing experts. For example, we're interested in providing finance experts, architects, artists.
Speaker 9
There are so many professions and so many people who will come to Ukraine and help us to rebuild. Each country will get its own region. For
Speaker 1
example, with the Great
Speaker 9
Britain, we've actually with Mr. Johnson, he agreed actually to become a patron of the Kyiv
Speaker 1
region.
Speaker 9
Let's say in his country with the Sweden, we'll
Speaker 1
negotiate it. They would take the region to
Speaker 9
take care of, and step
Speaker 1
by step we will actually distribute it. So as my colleague said and
Speaker 9
colleagues from
Speaker 1
European Union, it's a very smart idea, I said. Why? Because we decided it would be better
Speaker 9
to
Speaker 1
say
Speaker 9
people decided and we just have to implement this. Ukraine is paving the way to European Union membership. And I do think that this way will do it faster if European Union countries
Speaker 1
will be
Speaker 9
united or joined under this umbrella, under this project. Each country will get an opportunity to help any region recover, and they will get the feeling of doing something truly important, helping the states rebuild. And this will be a contribution in Ukrainian victory as well, and this will be a great contribution
Speaker 1
to the victory of democracy
Speaker 9
at
Speaker 1
European continent.
Speaker 9
So far
Speaker 1
it looks
Speaker 9
like
Speaker 1
this, and some specific details about the funds, the plans, each region will present a plan, a
Speaker 9
plan
Speaker 1
for city
Speaker 9
and a plan for the region. And I
Speaker 1
do think
Speaker 9
that this
Speaker 1
project does
Speaker 9
have a great future.
Speaker 1
And
Speaker 9
I do think that all of us will definitely take part in that project. We will be the participants, we just need to find our own like words. It's not be like, I don't know how to call
Speaker 1
it.
Speaker 9
When you finish your work, how you can start helping your city. Okay, that's like the big cleaning, a big recovery.
Speaker 4
Okay.
Speaker 9
Antenna TV, if I do pronounce it, Greece, in the very, very rare. Okay, right, part of the row.
Speaker 18
Thank you very much, Mr. President. Christos Mosanidis from Antenna Television, Greece. The Russian commander, General Rastam, Mina Kayev, if I say that right, told the defense industry meeting that Russia was seeking to win control of swathes of territory extending to Moldova, Ukraine's southern neighbor. That would cut off Ukraine's actions to the Black Sea. What is your understanding? And secondly, I want to ask you, according to the Ukrainian foreign ministry, Russian forces have illegally removed thousands of Ukrainian children from Donetsk and Luhansk, or blast to Russia. Do you have any number to give us and more information about this? Thank you.
Speaker 1
Thank
Speaker 9
you so much. Unfortunately,
Unknown speaker
the
Speaker 1
figures are tragic. The statistics are horrible. I just want to apologize if these are not correct, and these can't be correct. They simply can't be correct. Because regarding
Speaker 9
people
Speaker 1
who
Speaker 9
unfortunately died,
Speaker 1
we
Speaker 9
also have people who were tortured in the basement, and people buried,
Speaker 1
and also
Speaker 9
we
Speaker 1
have people who were
Speaker 9
deported. Nobody will give you
Speaker 1
the exact figure. No one. What we have is we consider this to be approximately half
Speaker 9
a million of people were deported
Speaker 1
from
Speaker 9
various
Speaker 1
occupied parts
Speaker 9
of our
Speaker 1
country, to the territory
Speaker 9
of Russian Federation, or partially to occupied east, let's call it, occupied parts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Half a million. We consider this to be the figure. Concerning children, we
Speaker 1
don't have the number.
Speaker 9
I just
Speaker 1
remember one thing.
Speaker 9
Irina, how
Speaker 1
many? Like 5,000 approximately. 5,000. It's something that we had a week ago. I can't tell
Speaker 9
you
Speaker 1
the figure as
Speaker 9
of this day. I
Speaker 1
can't tell you if this is correct.
Speaker 9
Not
Speaker 1
fewer than 5,000. Why is it so tragic? Why my uncertainty is tragic? We can have more. We can
Speaker 9
have 5,000 or more, unfortunately.
Speaker 1
And the second part
Speaker 9
I just forgot.
Speaker 1
Yes, yes, they claimed. I remember, they claimed. Every day we have signals, we get signals from Russia,
Speaker 9
from
Speaker 1
Russian military leadership about capturing, about their wish to capture certain
Speaker 9
territory.
Speaker 1
We've heard about it for so many times.
Unknown speaker
And
Speaker 1
the risks, yes,
Speaker 9
these risks exist. Yes, they have the wish. Concerning the result, we will see. We will definitely try to protect our territory and we will protect
Speaker 4
it. If
Speaker 9
I pronounce it, Italy, first or second row.
Speaker 15
Thank you, Mr. President. Claudio Locatelli, Italy. So in two days in Italy will be the national day of resistance, remembering the historical resistance of partisans against the Nazi fascists. Some people think it's not comparable. Some others think it's actually your resistance, the Ukrainian people's resistance, is the nowadays resistance. Moreover, some people believe that in order to protect your citizen, you should give up. Despite the invasion of Russia. What is your answer to those people? Thank you.
Speaker 9
Thank you so much. Thank you. Ukrainians, don't give up.
Speaker 1
We won't. I
Speaker 9
think that we've already managed to prove it, not just with words or, you
Unknown speaker
know,
Speaker 9
statements, whatever. We proved it with every single day, every single
Speaker 1
step,
Speaker 9
every
Speaker 1
pain we live,
Speaker 9
every fight we
Speaker 1
have against Russian Federation.
Speaker 9
This is pure,
Speaker 1
they are
Speaker 9
Nazi.
Speaker 1
They
Speaker 9
killed, they tortured, everything they did to children, you know it. Little children, toddlers, violence against children, children abuse,
Speaker 1
rapes,
Speaker 9
everything that happened.
Speaker 1
It's not just
Speaker 9
a manifestation.
Speaker 1
They are
Speaker 9
Nazi. And historically, their state,
Speaker 1
in
Speaker 9
the books in history,
Speaker 1
they will have
Speaker 9
the words
Speaker 1
that nobody invented.
Unknown speaker
They
Speaker 9
just,
Speaker 1
people just
Speaker 9
repeat it in Ukraine and in Europe. It's called racism
Speaker 1
or racists.
Speaker 9
Racists.
Speaker 1
Like they
Speaker 9
are racist, like
Speaker 1
Nazis,
Speaker 9
but
Speaker 1
Russists. This is a new word. This is a new word.
Speaker 9
Meaning these are Russian Nazi because
Speaker 1
they behave
Speaker 9
the same like Nazis
Speaker 1
did 80
Speaker 9
years
Speaker 1
ago.
Speaker 9
Within these 80 years, if you do analyze
Speaker 1
it, if you actually try
Speaker 9
to look at the continent, what
Speaker 1
was happening? Such barbaric behavior,
Speaker 9
it never
Speaker 1
happened. Racism, as we say, this will
Speaker 9
be there in
Speaker 1
history books,
Speaker 9
in
Speaker 1
Wikipedias
Speaker 9
or something. This will
Speaker 1
be
Speaker 9
carved in
Speaker 1
stone.
Speaker 9
This will be something that little children sitting in
Speaker 1
schools, they
Speaker 9
will learn
Speaker 1
and
Speaker 9
they will answer to their
Speaker 1
teachers what the racism is when
Speaker 9
it started,
Speaker 1
in what
Speaker 9
country and who won their freedom back and who fought against this horrible thing. Thank
Speaker 4
you. Al Jazeera English.
Speaker 9
Al Jazeera English. So the central aisle, please.
Speaker 19
President, from Al Jazeera English. We've been talking about the war in the East. Russia now is saying it wants to, it has territorial ambitions all the way to Transnistria. I know you're satisfied with the military aid you're getting, but this is a huge area of exploration for militarily speaking. Are you confident that you can tackle that, that you can avoid another Mariupol somewhere else where civilians and military are besieged? And are you able to also protect Odessa, which is so important for you, and for the world because of the global food supplies? And then my second question is about war crimes. I know you talk very strongly about all what's been happening and one can see that you're very affected of it. What kind of tribunal would you like? Would you like a special tribunal for Ukraine? Or would you like to go through the Hague? What kind of mechanism do you see there?
Speaker 1
I don't care how
Speaker 9
we will call the
Speaker 1
tribunal. I don't care about the
Speaker 9
name. I
Speaker 1
really want to get the result. And all of us, the
Speaker 9
citizens, we want to get the result. So
Speaker 1
it doesn't matter if it's Hague or
Speaker 9
is
Speaker 1
it Ukraine
Speaker 9
or
Speaker 1
if this
Speaker 9
is like
Speaker 1
any other process.
Speaker 9
Frankly,
Speaker 1
it's not the name.
Speaker 9
It's just about the years and people.
Unknown speaker
How
Speaker 9
many
Speaker 1
people will get, how
Speaker 9
many of these people will get a specific number of years of imprisonment? That's what we care about. It's about the second question. Frankly, our prosecutors, our prosecutor
Speaker 1
general's office, they
Speaker 9
work with our European
Speaker 1
partners. They have very
Speaker 9
tight cooperation. They have investigative groups, joint groups, and we have some joint processes. I do think there will be an international tribunal. I consider, we consider that the result will be there.
Speaker 1
The process
Speaker 9
is ongoing.
Speaker 1
I can see a huge, huge
Speaker 9
support in this area. And the prosecutor Han actually visited us and so many other French experts recently. They visited us. I had a meeting
Speaker 1
with
Speaker 9
Mr.
Speaker 1
Sanchez, with the Spanish
Speaker 9
prime minister, and their specialists actually are involved. And so many European countries will be invited to take part. Everyone wants to punish the criminals. Everybody knows who are the criminals.
Speaker 1
Regarding the
Speaker 9
Transnistria,
Speaker 1
so
Speaker 9
regarding Moldova,
Speaker 1
can we,
Speaker 9
God forbid, have the same
Speaker 1
tragedy like in Mariupol?
Speaker 9
Yes, it may happen.
Speaker 1
Thousands of tanks,
Speaker 9
thousands of APVs, a complicated situation,
Speaker 1
accumulation of Russian armament around the borders at our territory. Yes, they want to make this corridor. They want to just get
Speaker 9
some fresh water for the Crimea. They
Speaker 1
already have it.
Speaker 9
They
Speaker 1
already took
Speaker 9
all
Speaker 1
the territories, but they don't
Speaker 9
have
Speaker 1
water. It's not that
Speaker 9
simple. It's
Speaker 1
not just about getting a corridor. You just need to have a couple
Speaker 9
of
Speaker 1
more
Speaker 9
steps to be made. All these risks are there.
Speaker 1
These are not fake. But I don't
Speaker 9
believe these people
Speaker 1
will stop if we stop them.
Speaker 9
Then
Speaker 1
have negotiations. If we manage
Speaker 9
to strengthen our positions,
Speaker 1
then my position will
Speaker 9
strengthen in the negotiation process.
Speaker 1
But
Speaker 9
again, I just want to say one thing.
Speaker 1
You can't
Speaker 9
use power. I consider we proved it. You can't use force and inhumanity to win in Ukraine. You can't. Just what will you do with Ukraine then? What do you need it for
Speaker 1
after this? What
Speaker 9
could they
Speaker 1
do in Kiev region?
Speaker 9
People
Speaker 1
hate
Speaker 9
them. All
Speaker 1
of them. What
Speaker 9
could they
Speaker 1
do?
Speaker 9
Nazis.
Speaker 1
What did they do 80
Speaker 9
years ago? They occupied Europe. What did they do? What did they manage to achieve? Even at that moment when they were just drinking champagne in French restaurants.
Speaker 1
What did they do?
Speaker 9
People
Speaker 1
loved them.
Speaker 9
Not at all.
Speaker 1
They didn't.
Speaker 9
Actually, they became
Speaker 1
richer. Yes, they stole a lot. They took
Speaker 9
everything
Speaker 1
from museums,
Speaker 9
from palaces. What did
Speaker 1
they achieve? All they've achieved is that many generations in Germany, the
Speaker 2
young
Speaker 1
people in
Speaker 2
Germany have nothing to do with those events.
Speaker 1
They feel,
Speaker 2
they always feel that
Speaker 1
historically
Speaker 2
they have some sort of guilt. This is the thing that you can
Speaker 1
achieve. That
Speaker 2
is why
Speaker 1
I
Speaker 2
don't
Speaker 1
understand the reason. Why do you need yet another corridor, yet another country? They've taken Transnistria. They've taken Asia.
Speaker 2
Is that
Speaker 1
Hong Kong over there?
Speaker 2
Is there
Speaker 1
Dubai over there?
Speaker 2
I don't know.
Speaker 1
What's
Speaker 2
the
Speaker 1
reason?
Speaker 2
What's so tractable? Who's happy in those territories?
Speaker 4
If I pronounce that correctly, from Sweden, by
Speaker 2
the central aisle to the right.
Unknown speaker
Thank
Speaker 14
you very much, Mr. President. You mentioned before with the rebuilding. In your speech to the Swedish Parliament, you reached out specifically to Sweden to be part of this. First of all, I just wondered why Sweden? And the second one, given Sweden's status as a non-NATO country, do you ask something specifically from Sweden right now? And the third one, in your speech to the Parliament, you compared our flags saying it is not coincidence but destiny that they have the same color. How do you see future relations between Ukraine and Sweden? Thank you.
Speaker 1
I believe that
Speaker 2
we have
Speaker 1
a fairly good relationship and
Speaker 2
I'm grateful to Sweden as they do support, they do provide us with assistance. Not only through humanitarian assistance, they
Speaker 1
truly support us. I'm not ready
Speaker 2
to discuss all the
Speaker 1
details
Speaker 2
at this
Speaker 1
point. Why Sweden? We are called on many countries. You've asked
Speaker 2
why Sweden? Don't you want to
Speaker 1
join the rebuilding process? Look, we do have a good relationship with Sweden. And it's
Speaker 2
not
Speaker 1
about
Speaker 2
the assistance of your
Speaker 1
country to Ukraine, it's about
Speaker 2
joint future.
Speaker 1
As I've
Speaker 2
said,
Speaker 1
this
Speaker 2
is a part of
Speaker 1
a big program that has to do with our membership in the European Union. And that's our
Speaker 2
future in the
Speaker 1
joint victory. And that is why we
Speaker 2
are calling upon those countries whom we
Speaker 1
truly
Speaker 2
trust
Speaker 1
and respect. And that's why we are active with
Speaker 2
speaking on the other types of assistance and support. I don't want to go into details. We're expecting the support and it will arrive. I'm grateful for that and I know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 4
Now CBS to the right by the
Speaker 2
column, close to the central aisle.
Speaker 20
Thank you, Mr. President. Chris Lipsay, CBS News. You've said that the Russian people need to learn their history and be made aware of how much they've made their neighbors suffer. How are they supposed to do that so long as Vladimir Putin is their president? My second question is, how are you holding up personally?
Speaker 1
Well, how? Any person
Speaker 2
who's willing to learn
Speaker 1
the truth, they will find the truth. People want to understand what's happening around their country, what's happening in the world. This person can't find this information. We are developing whenever we are reading something, we are learning something, we are researching for something. Well, let's say whenever we are not sitting on the sofa and just listening or watching to the TV or Russian
Speaker 2
propaganda. And then when we switch on the TV,
Speaker 1
when
Speaker 2
we go
Speaker 1
outside
Speaker 2
and we have our eyes closed, and then whenever we go to work, whenever we are visiting any country or any city in Russia, whenever we can only
Speaker 1
see and only hear to what is provided on TV. This has done the right thing. I mean, we can't break this information bubble. You can't break through that bubble only from our side. I mean, we have to
Speaker 19
go
Speaker 1
towards one another. There are people in the Russian society who are willing
Speaker 2
to have more information,
Speaker 1
and
Speaker 2
there should be more and more of those people, and if they are willing to learn the true information, then
Speaker 1
they have to accept that truth, and there is this truth. They know that nobody's been killed on the streets
Speaker 2
of their cities. They can see that they have to understand that they're guilty, that their authorities are guilty. They've elected their authorities. They can't say that I have nothing to do with
Speaker 1
that. Well,
Speaker 2
our country is guilty. They can say that they can't do anything except for these words, and that I feel myself as the Russian citizen, and I feel that we will be responsible for that, that we take responsibility for that, and that's already
Speaker 1
an important
Speaker 2
step. They
Speaker 1
have to recognize this, that this is the bravery, this is the integrity of a person, despite
Speaker 2
whatever is thrown at your back, either the words or the stones. You don't have to be afraid of, and I think that's an important step to be made,
Speaker 1
and there's two words to describe it, the willingness of people. So answering your question when their people would
Speaker 2
be
Speaker 1
willing to learn the truth, and that moves to exit that computer game.
Speaker 2
I mean, living in Russia, it's like a computer game. It's a virtual reality. So when
Speaker 1
they press exit,
Unknown speaker
when
Speaker 1
they will remove
Speaker 2
those 3D glasses with three colors, when they will travel away, when they will go to reality, to the civilized world, it's beautiful, it's marvelous. It's much wider,
Speaker 1
it's
Speaker 2
much more
Speaker 1
beautiful, because it's truthful. And you shouldn't be like a leader in
Speaker 2
nuclear weapons. You can become a leader in all the countries with most civil IT experts. You don't need to launch a missile. Instead, you can pay salary to teachers.
Speaker 1
You can work, you
Speaker 2
can
Speaker 1
find a medicine for cancer. There are
Speaker 2
more areas where you can spend
Speaker 1
your
Speaker 2
money, your potential. We know that they have talented people. We know the history. They have the scientists, and historically there are scientists. There are mathematicians, many others. So there is what to spend
Speaker 1
those brains for.
Speaker 2
There's the intellect
Speaker 1
for. I mean, using normal sense, no offense, because on
Speaker 2
our territory,
Unknown speaker
they
Speaker 2
are losing their people. Yeah, they're
Unknown speaker
just
Speaker 4
losing them. Let's continue. Let's have someone from Ukraine, Telegraph, and
Speaker 2
the central aisle to the left, please. Greetings, President. The Telegraph publication. The Russian oligarch Abramovich has visited Kyiv twice, according to mass media, and he met our representatives. Did you have a meeting with him?
Speaker 1
And does
Speaker 2
he have any role in negotiations?
Speaker 1
Well,
Speaker 2
according to my information, and I have a lot of information,
Speaker 1
he is a
Speaker 2
part of
Speaker 1
the Russian negotiating team.
Speaker 2
And according to my information, he was in Kyiv, and the format of his meetings, this is something that I'm not ready to discuss right
Speaker 4
now. Thank you. Now
Speaker 2
Jewish
Speaker 4
Chronicle,
Speaker 2
this third row, please.
Speaker 3
I see, yeah. John Sweeney from the Jewish Chronicle, and I'm taking on Putin podcast. We've all seen and admired Ukraine's heroic fights against what we've just got to call Russian fascism. But President Zelensky, what's your message to the Russian opposition, to the teenagers who go and make demonstrations and get beaten up? By the Russian police in Moscow? By the man who took a copy of War and Peace and stood by the key of monuments in Red Square? And to Alexei Navalny, what's your message to the good people of Russia who are trying to oppose Vladimir Putin?
Speaker 1
Thank you. It's important to send
Speaker 2
the
Speaker 1
signal
Speaker 2
to those
Speaker 1
people who are opposing the war. And I absolutely am confident that people in Moscow or
Speaker 2
in Russia, it's very difficult for them to go on the street, because whenever you're going on the street in any European country, you should be afraid of anything, because you will leave by the
Speaker 1
law,
Speaker 2
and unless you
Speaker 1
are violating the law, you will remain a free person. Nobody will detain you, because you know that everyone is equal by the
Speaker 2
law,
Speaker 1
and all those people going on those
Speaker 2
streets and squares,
Speaker 1
there's
Speaker 2
not many people in
Speaker 1
Russia going out on those streets and
Speaker 2
squares.
Speaker 1
But by those
Speaker 2
examples,
Speaker 1
they add up the energy, and
Speaker 2
they let us believe that we will be able, at certain point, to break through that information bubble that we've
Speaker 1
recalled today several times. So I can say the words of gratitude to them, because we can see their words, we can see their actions, and if anything can break through that information bubble, that's the words, because the words hit hard,
Speaker 2
and that's why those
Speaker 1
people are behind the bars. The words are just as powerful as bullets, because if they would be weaker than
Speaker 2
the weapons they wouldn't be imprisoned,
Unknown speaker
these
Speaker 1
people are being afraid of. Look, just imagine, a country with nuclear weapons is afraid of their people coming on the streets, that's why we're supporting those people,
Speaker 2
we're grateful to
Speaker 1
those people,
Speaker 2
and I can
Speaker 1
wish them only health, because I understand what the police or law enforcement are doing to them, and they've made their
Speaker 2
own contribution in the savior of the history of Russia, they've made a contribution in that. I know that
Speaker 4
there are a lot of journalists from Japan, so
Speaker 2
now I'd like
Speaker 4
to have,
Speaker 2
if there are any journalists from Japan?
Unknown speaker
Okay,
Speaker 2
Nikkei Asia, please, now I can see you, you have a chance to ask your question. The
Speaker 6
question is about the risk of Putin using a nuke. You, in some interviews, talk about, we have to prepare for the worst-case scenario, Putin uses a nuke. What do you think, in what circumstance he is tempted to use a nuke? Something like Ukraine repels more Russian occupation, in that he's cornered, then he's likely to use a nuke. And the second question is, some kind of concern is, because of this war, a lot of countries might attempt to have nuclear weapons. What do you think, what if Ukraine didn't give up nuke at Budapest, do you think this war didn't happen? Do you regret it?
Speaker 1
Okay, let's have a detailed analysis
Speaker 2
of your question.
Speaker 1
Let's go step by step. First of all, I don't believe that anyone who's
Speaker 2
truly an adequate
Speaker 1
person can use a nuclear weapon. I think it's
Speaker 2
not that
Speaker 1
when the person is cornered, but
Speaker 2
when the person has no
Speaker 1
relation
Speaker 2
to
Speaker 1
reality,
Speaker 2
when the person is not in sound mind. Otherwise, you cannot justify the
Speaker 1
use of nuclear weapons. And if the leadership of the Russian Federation or still
Speaker 2
have
Speaker 1
at least some sort of connection to reality, they will not
Speaker 2
use the nuclear
Speaker 1
weapons. Now, this
Speaker 2
is also an answer to another part
Speaker 1
of your question, whether is
Speaker 2
this something that can happen on the part of Russian Federation? It can. It can happen. Whether I believe in
Speaker 1
that?
Speaker 2
Well, it's not that I would really like to believe in things like that. But you can see my response to the second part
Speaker 1
of your question.
Unknown speaker
Sure,
Speaker 1
you
Speaker 2
understand,
Speaker 1
if we would
Speaker 2
have a nuclear
Speaker 1
weapon, of course
Speaker 2
Ukraine would never use
Speaker 1
this. This is something that is utterly impossible, because we are an adequate people. Any leader of our country who would be even
Speaker 2
starting to think like
Speaker 1
that, I mean,
Speaker 2
our people
Speaker 1
would crush him immediately. Our
Speaker 2
society would crush him. I would be the first one among others to run against
Speaker 1
that person. The only thing which is interesting is people somewhere deep in their soul. If
Speaker 2
they're considering they're capable of doing things like that, then there are people who think that there could be others who would be doing things like that. So I think if we would have nuclear weapons, then I think the risks of any aggression on the part of Russia would be reduced to minimum. That's what I believe.
Speaker 4
That's it.
Speaker 2
Now NBC at this center by the aisle.
Speaker 11
Mr. President, Erin McLaughlin, NBC News. With respect to tomorrow's visit from the U.S. Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense, why is it important for high-ranking U.S. officials to visit the Ukrainian capital? And what do you plan to tell them? Also, the Secretary of Defense is next expected to travel to Germany to meet with allies to discuss Ukraine's long- and short-term security needs. What do you expect out of that meeting?
Speaker 1
I
Speaker 2
couldn't
Speaker 1
hear the second part of your question. I didn't hear. Can you repeat, please, the second part?
Speaker 11
The U.S. Secretary of Defense is expected to then travel to Germany to meet with allies to discuss Ukraine's long-term and short-term security needs. What would you like to see out of that meeting?
Speaker 1
Thank you. Why is that important
Speaker 2
for
Speaker 1
the leaders
Speaker 2
to
Speaker 1
arrive to Ukraine? Let me give you a dramatic answer. Because
Speaker 2
you can't arrive to Ukraine without nothing
Speaker 1
in
Speaker 2
your
Speaker 1
hands,
Speaker 2
and we're not asking for presents or cakes or sweets.
Speaker 1
We are seeking weapons. That's why I think we can receive an agreement from the United States or part of the package that we've agreed
Speaker 2
on
Speaker 1
before. That's why I think that's a positive signal, just the same as the leaders of other countries.
Speaker 2
I can frankly tell
Speaker 1
you that we're discussing
Speaker 2
silently a
Speaker 1
lot of things. There is this silent diplomacy. I don't really like it, but still. So we are calling upon all the leaders. And how
Speaker 2
would
Speaker 1
I put it? That we're not
Speaker 2
a country for tragic selfies. We
Speaker 1
have a real war. So please come to Ukraine. We would be
Speaker 2
happy to welcome
Speaker 1
you. But please come and
Speaker 2
bring
Speaker 1
the support, since you do have the possibilities. We never ask, and we never call upon any nation
Speaker 2
for support. We never ask if we're not sure that this country has it.
Speaker 1
We're not creating any uncomfortable situation.
Speaker 2
That's why the visit of the United States is very important. We have strategic
Speaker 1
issues
Speaker 2
with regards to the security guarantees. And
Speaker 1
it's my time for us
Speaker 2
to have a fruitful discussion
Speaker 1
on that matter, because the United States would be
Speaker 2
one
Speaker 1
of the leaders, one of the security guarantees for our country. And however it would all end up, the security guarantees are still necessary. And we will insist on that. And I'm confident that we will receive an expected result, a long
Speaker 2
-awaited result. That's why we are waiting for those guests. And speaking on the arrival or, let's say, the visit of the Secretary of Defense to Germany,
Speaker 1
we are expecting for
Speaker 2
the United States
Speaker 1
to
Speaker 2
support us in their dialogue with Germany, so that the Germany would finally start to supply us what they have. And they're not using that,
Speaker 1
because
Speaker 2
the war is on the territory of Ukraine. And every time in our conversation with Germany, we tell them that the war is currently in Ukraine, and you have what we need and you don't need.
Speaker 4
Thank
Speaker 9
you. Thank you. And then BBC, I guess. So, good evening. What would you say to Putin in the very beginning of your meeting? And how do you evaluate the work of Ukrainian ambassadors? If someone is slightly, like, failing, when shall we have, like, another wave of rotations? You know, step rotations in what countries? So the first part, what would I say to Putin? Okay.
Speaker 1
I
Speaker 9
think
Speaker 1
that
Speaker 9
my
Speaker 1
questions, the
Speaker 9
questions
Speaker 1
that I, or my
Speaker 9
statements that I would like to
Speaker 1
discuss,
Speaker 9
these would exclusively
Speaker 1
refer,
Speaker 9
exclusively refer
Speaker 1
to something
Speaker 9
I'm
Speaker 1
interested in as
Speaker 9
a president of Ukraine, exclusively as a president of Ukraine. Territorial
Speaker 1
integrity,
Speaker 9
first and foremost. I would discuss the issues of
Speaker 1
territorial
Speaker 9
integrity. How shall Donbass live in future? I mean, Ukrainian Donbass. How shall Ukrainian Crimea live and exist? In which specific point can we negotiate upon it? Can we actually negotiate upon it? Can we agree upon it? The most important thing is that you raise the issue. And we hear, all of us do hear that Russian Federation starts responding.
Speaker 1
Not
Speaker 9
in a satisfactory way for us, but still this dialogue
Speaker 1
is initiated. So
Speaker 9
without
Speaker 1
any extra
Speaker 9
sentiments, the issues for discussion will be very specific.
Speaker 1
I'm
Speaker 9
not sure that
Speaker 1
very
Speaker 9
emotional,
Speaker 1
but
Speaker 9
you
Speaker 1
see
Speaker 9
how
Speaker 1
I do react and respond. Everything can happen. But the
Speaker 9
second part,
Speaker 1
just about the
Speaker 9
ambassadors.
Unknown speaker
If
Speaker 1
someone,
Speaker 9
Ukrainian ambassadors, I mean, if someone is not that productive or… What exactly did you mean? You have to specify the question.
Unknown speaker
Well,
Speaker 9
yes, we work with
Speaker 1
ambassadors, of course,
Speaker 9
and
Speaker 1
today ambassadors
Speaker 9
have a very clear task.
Speaker 1
And assessing
Speaker 9
their
Speaker 1
work
Speaker 9
today is very simple,
Speaker 1
as simple as can be. Their task number
Speaker 9
one is the weapon supply,
Speaker 1
the armament supply. And we
Speaker 9
will
Speaker 1
evaluate their
Speaker 9
results and performance after the war is
Speaker 1
over. We will give
Speaker 9
the grade.
Speaker 1
If someone
Speaker 9
is not able to show the result, we have such people. Yes, it's true. It's a war. Nobody gives a second chance because we are at the state of warfare. That's how we assess their performance. That's it. Okay, we have BBC,
Unknown speaker
please.
Speaker 9
Left part of the hall.
Speaker 21
Considering we've got Antonio Gutierrez, the United Nations Secretary General, coming to Russia and then here, realistically, what do you hope to see come out of his meeting with President Putin? And does Russia's role in the Security Council essentially render the United Nations useless in this regard?
Speaker 1
Well, the public messages,
Speaker 9
we already presented it, we talked about it. As long
Speaker 1
as we have the war,
Unknown speaker
they
Speaker 1
can't be
Speaker 9
a member
Speaker 1
of the Security Council, nothing to talk about. That's clear. I gave you the
Speaker 9
details today. I think it's
Speaker 1
a mistake to go first to Russia and only then to Ukraine. It's just wrong. What gave
Speaker 9
us
Speaker 1
messages from Russia? What is the purpose? The logic is,
Speaker 9
this
Speaker 1
is the
Speaker 9
logic. It
Speaker 1
means that
Speaker 9
someone
Speaker 1
actually
Speaker 9
has
Speaker 1
this
Speaker 9
ambiguous opinion. It means that the position is not clear about who is the aggressor. This is undelied. It's not an issue of coming to us first. It's not a competition. It's not a
Speaker 1
competition. There's
Speaker 9
no justice
Speaker 1
in this
Speaker 9
queue in this
Speaker 1
line. There's no logic.
Speaker 9
We need
Speaker 1
to add logic
Speaker 9
to this
Speaker 1
recipe. What is the logic?
Speaker 9
It's simple. If you want to finish
Speaker 1
a war, if you want to bring it to an end, you must clearly know what's happening. Come and see what's
Speaker 9
happening.
Speaker 1
What
Speaker 9
he will see
Speaker 1
in Russia?
Speaker 9
No
Speaker 1
dead bodies in
Speaker 9
Kutuzovsky
Speaker 1
Avenue. What he wants to see there first. He, a person of that status, I'm not entitled to
Speaker 9
actually affect him, to influence him in any way
Speaker 1
in
Speaker 9
his position,
Speaker 1
unfortunately. But
Speaker 9
it seems to me it's purely logical first to go to Ukraine, see the people, see everything they did. I mean the Russians, the consequences of the occupation, of the hostilities. And with that experience, with that baggage, to go to Russian Federation, to visit Putin and actually with that kind of experience, to formulate a message with this experience and express yourself
Speaker 1
and talk to Russia. Then you can ask
Speaker 9
questions, I
Speaker 1
guess. UN Secretary General can ask like the highest level questions. This is a top
Speaker 9
leader,
Speaker 1
the top position. Ask questions. Look for solutions. How can he avoid talking
Speaker 9
to it? What to offer?
Speaker 1
What to offer then if he
Speaker 9
doesn't talk to us first? It's just illogical. It's pure absence of logic. But who knows? People have like a lot of experience. Maybe they know better. We'll see.
Speaker 4
Thank
Speaker 9
you, colleagues. It's been two hours of communication. We're about to come to an end. We have to respect the curfew, the central part. Sorry, the left flank and then
Speaker 4
answer.
Speaker 9
And then we'll see.
Speaker 1
So
Speaker 9
tomorrow we have Easter and the Easter will be celebrated by Ukrainians, not only in their country, in occupied territories, unfortunately. People even abroad. There are so many Ukrainians abroad. Of course, Ukrainians, just like all other normal people in the world, they expect for the war to finish. What can you tell them or promise maybe? Can you just do it? I prepared
Speaker 1
a big speech to
Speaker 9
my country specifically
Speaker 1
for Easter and Easter
Speaker 9
speech
Speaker 1
to my citizens, to citizens
Speaker 9
I do respect, of the state I love
Speaker 1
so
Speaker 9
much. And
Speaker 1
you can't even understand the scope
Speaker 9
of my love.
Speaker 1
So I truly want to
Speaker 9
have peace
Speaker 1
like any human
Speaker 9
being.
Speaker 1
I
Speaker 9
want to wish
Speaker 1
them, all of them, to stay healthy, to stay safe. I want
Speaker 9
them to have
Speaker 1
some ordinary things finally
Speaker 9
like family happiness, joy.
Speaker 1
I never thought I would say
Speaker 9
this. You
Speaker 1
know what we previously said? We used to say like
Speaker 9
wishing some health or wishing our grannies and grandpas to stay safe and stay healthy because they are already old and to live a long life. I never thought I can wish to have a long life to children, to toddlers because of the war. I wish everyone, infants, toddlers, adults, teenagers, please, people save your children if you can. Keep them alive and safe.
Speaker 1
As
Speaker 9
a president,
Speaker 1
fortunately or unfortunately,
Speaker 9
I
Speaker 1
can't say I share the
Speaker 9
pain of each woman and each man. Everyone who unfortunately lost their children, I can understand this feeling
Speaker 4
as
Speaker 9
a father. Ansa, please, please. In
Speaker 22
the center. Ansa, Italian news agency. Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi is planning to come to Kiev in the next days. What do you expect from him and from the Italian government? Thank you.
Speaker 1
Thank
Speaker 9
you.
Speaker 1
Thank you. Recently, definitely,
Speaker 9
Italy, we can say that Italy has joined the anti-war coalition. I feel their strong support from Prime Minister Draghi as well. I'm grateful to him. We changed our relations in such a complicated moment. We had wonderful relations actually between Ukraine and Italy. Now,
Speaker 1
it's
Speaker 9
specifically wonderful. It became very practical. Italy supports us politically and support us with weapons. They are not afraid to say about it. I'm so grateful to Italy. I'm grateful to Italian people. And I'm grateful to Prime Minister. And that's
Speaker 1
true. We will
Speaker 9
expect, of course,
Speaker 1
Mr. Draghi to come. We're looking forward to that. He will get the full support from Ukrainian citizens. For him, it's important, I guess.
Speaker 9
I do consider this.
Speaker 1
This is not the first prime minister I've seen. I mean Italian prime ministers. I've seen them. I've met them. And there
Speaker 9
is certain historical watershed moment for our countries right now. Not just at the
Speaker 1
level of people. People always
Speaker 9
supported us. I mean the citizens. But at the level of government, we wanted to have the support. Italian government in this specific conflict, in this war between Russia and Ukraine, Italy picked our side. And I'm truly grateful for it, for this very clear, for this definite position.
Speaker 4
Okay, let's have
Speaker 9
the last question. Tarka, Ukraine,
Unknown speaker
please.
Speaker 9
This will be the last question. Thank you, colleagues. Mr. President, tomorrow we'll have two months from the beginning of the full-scale invasion. We woke up on February 24th from the explosions. We lived in shelters. And people lived here on the subway. And today we have the opportunity to have the press conference. What do we need to do? What do we need to get from our international partners to have a press conference in Mariupol or in any other city in eastern Ukraine or southern Ukraine or in Kherson, wherever? Thank you. Thank you. I want to
Speaker 1
tell you, frankly, Ukraine already
Speaker 9
did everything.
Speaker 1
We
Speaker 9
did
Speaker 1
everything we could.
Speaker 9
This
Speaker 1
is my opinion. We
Speaker 9
are
Speaker 1
so
Speaker 9
united. We are
Speaker 1
tied. We are the links of the chain.
Speaker 9
We just have
Speaker 1
to keep it
Speaker 9
in ourselves.
Speaker 1
Keep it
Speaker 9
by
Speaker 1
the end of the war. Save it. And keep
Speaker 9
it after the war. We are like one
Speaker 1
body right now, you know?
Speaker 9
Breathing,
Speaker 1
living body. The word power of government.
Speaker 9
President, nobody
Speaker 1
actually responds negatively to these words. No negative connotations. I'm so proud of being a leader of a state. And I consider
Speaker 9
this to be a
Speaker 1
great victory.
Speaker 9
And our great
Speaker 1
weapon, the strongest weapon, uniting
Speaker 9
the
Speaker 1
power,
Speaker 9
the
Speaker 1
forces of
Speaker 9
military,
Speaker 1
special service officers, national guard, state border guard who were
Speaker 9
the
Speaker 1
first to respond, the communication officers who were the first to take the missiles. Those missiles flew from Belarus. And I'm so proud. I'm so proud of our defenders. They are so different. Local authorities. Imagine yourself loving your mayor, loving your local council. What level of support when people came to local elections to actually vote
Speaker 9
for
Speaker 1
MPs? They simply ignored it as
Speaker 9
we
Speaker 1
had it. Now we have this, I don't know, people
Speaker 9
are
Speaker 1
merging into one body. This is weapon number one.
Speaker 9
And Ukraine did it.
Speaker 1
We did it.
Speaker 9
Due to various reasons. And various heroes
Speaker 1
of
Speaker 9
this process we have. So many
Speaker 1
heroes with different
Speaker 9
faces,
Speaker 1
different eyes.
Speaker 9
The second weapon.
Speaker 1
The media weapon. We united the media information resource.
Speaker 9
It became
Speaker 1
a very powerful, strong weapon.
Speaker 9
And
Speaker 1
I think that today this is truly the second power. This is definitely the power. That is how we can
Speaker 9
oppose
Speaker 1
the aggressor. We stand for our interests. We
Speaker 9
advocate for
Speaker 1
ourselves. A powerful media campaign. What actually
Speaker 9
helped us to
Speaker 1
merge,
Unknown speaker
to unite?
Speaker 1
Internally and externally. All our requests. Our journalists' announcements. Foreign journalists. Journalists of Western countries. I'm so grateful to you all because we have our own army. But it's like the second army that we have. We can oppose Russia. We can't oppose Russia only with the help of
Speaker 9
our journalists.
Speaker 1
But with millions
Speaker 9
of foreign
Speaker 1
journalists.
Speaker 9
We showed that this
Speaker 1
was possible. We united
Speaker 9
with all
Speaker 1
of you.
Speaker 9
All
Speaker 1
of you sitting here today. And your colleagues from other states. You
Speaker 9
bring the
Speaker 1
truth to your people. It's like Easter Eve. You
Speaker 9
are like
Speaker 1
the Christ's supporters. You are the Christ's followers. You bring his word to people. You tell about Russia. About its aggression. About its friends. About its tyranny. About its
Speaker 9
monstrous hostilities. You feel it. You see it. That's why we ask you to bring only something that you know. You as professionals, you can bring the
Speaker 1
truth
Speaker 9
to
Speaker 1
people. This is a big power that gives us unity as well. We as government, we as political leaders, we did everything to get the support of European countries.
Speaker 9
We actually, we
Speaker 1
talked
Speaker 9
to governments. We talked, we had another front line at the political level. Maybe someone will actually apologize me
Speaker 1
from European countries. Sometimes we were insolent.
Speaker 9
But
Speaker 1
try to understand this. We are at the state of war. My people are dying. We don't have time. We
Speaker 9
don't have minutes, days and years. We have three month old children dying. That's why I behave like that. That's why I'm insolent because I
Speaker 11
feel it.
Speaker 9
Because I feel that this will give me a fast result and this will give me a strong result. This
Speaker 1
is the third front line. The third army we have. European states, they've never been
Speaker 9
so much united.
Speaker 1
Everybody told me about it. The last meeting. Andriy, you remember when we actually met the Prime Minister of Spain and the Prime Minister of Denmark. Yes. We met them. And they said
Speaker 9
we never,
Speaker 1
we never had
Speaker 9
that
Speaker 1
feeling before. We can't lose. We can't lose it. And they were grateful to us. But this is the gratitude to all of us, to all Ukrainian, to all
Speaker 9
the people. They were
Speaker 1
grateful for
Speaker 9
this
Speaker 1
feeling of unity. European Union was never that united at
Speaker 9
such a
Speaker 1
level to protect the values. We always spoke about those values.
Unknown speaker
But
Speaker 1
right now, these are the values that we fight for. You understand that you fight for. With us, we want to help you to bring this truth. This is the
Speaker 9
unity that
Speaker 1
brings us to victory. I
Speaker 9
don't
Speaker 1
want to tell you, you'll get offended and try to, you'll feel this is too personal. One of the Prime
Speaker 9
Ministers just told me that thanks to Ukraine, I
Speaker 1
understood what
Speaker 9
NATO
Speaker 1
is
Speaker 9
about. What the
Speaker 1
alliance is about.
Speaker 9
I got
Speaker 1
that message. And how should it look like?
Speaker 9
The task
Speaker 1
for the alliance. If it's capable of actually responding quickly
Speaker 9
to any kind of aggression,
Speaker 1
that
Speaker 9
is
Speaker 1
why Ukraine, it did so much. It did so much. It did unbelievably many
Speaker 9
things.
Speaker 1
Many
Speaker 9
things to unite the
Speaker 1
world.
Speaker 9
And not only the weapons.
Speaker 1
We have
Speaker 9
the unity,
Speaker 1
but the
Speaker 9
weapon. That's
Speaker 1
what we need. And we're about to have a
Speaker 9
religious holiday. At this
Speaker 1
holy land of Kyiv-Rus, where
Speaker 9
the
Speaker 1
Orthodox
Speaker 9
Christianity was actually
Speaker 1
born, so many centuries ago. Because this is the place right now, Kyiv is the place where the
Speaker 9
Orthodox Christianity was born. Russia says something like, no, Moscow was there. We know where it came from. We know where the roots are. We do not fight for
Speaker 1
being the first. We
Speaker 9
fight for
Speaker 1
existence of our history. For existence itself. For our own existence.
Speaker 9
We fight
Speaker 1
for peace.
Speaker 9
I just
Speaker 1
have to say.
Speaker 9
We fight
Speaker 1
for
Unknown speaker
peace.
Speaker 9
But
Speaker 1
we have to fight for peace not just with the word
Speaker 9
and
Speaker 1
truth, but with the weapon.
Speaker 9
This is the last piece
Speaker 1
of the puzzle
Speaker 9
that we
Speaker 1
have to get. All countries have to
Speaker 9
stand up.
Speaker 1
Being
Speaker 9
united. We are united already.
Speaker 1
We all are united. Please,
Speaker 9
don't
Speaker 1
lose your courage.
Speaker 9
Be brave.
Speaker 1
Be the brave people.
Speaker 9
Be the brave leaders.
Speaker 1
And not just for us. Not just for our
Speaker 9
victory.
Speaker 1
But for you. For yourselves.
Speaker 9
Because your
Speaker 1
communities, your societies, your
Speaker 9
nations,
Speaker 1
your people,
Unknown speaker
they
Speaker 9
wait for such
Speaker 1
leaders to arise. They wait
Speaker 9
for it.
Speaker 1
And after us,
Speaker 9
well, after
Speaker 1
us in a good sense,
Speaker 9
we are not saying
Speaker 1
goodbye now. I mean, after this war, you will see that your societies, your nations will change you. You will be brave. You will be ready
Speaker 9
to defend your states. Just like we do. With the same fierce motivation that we have
Speaker 1
today.
Speaker 9
By supporting us, thank you. We truly believe in that. Thank
Speaker 1
you. Ladies
Speaker 9
and gentlemen,
Speaker 1
unfortunately,
Speaker 9
I
Speaker 1
didn't have time for all the
Speaker 9
questions,
Speaker 1
but you
Speaker 9
had a
Speaker 1
very good offer.
Speaker 9
Let's
Speaker 1
meet in
Speaker 9
Mariupol
Speaker 1
when we free it. So we
Speaker 9
will continue and I hope it will happen
Speaker 1
soon.
Don't forget to donate, Ukraine's cause is ours! Support Ukraine!
