Russian losses

  • 1010 KWIA
  • 1 Tank
  • 3 AFVs
  • 42 Artillery systems
  • 2 MLRS
  • 1 Helicopter
  • 1527 UAVs
  • 183 Vehicles & fuel tanks

Russian activities

  • 175 Clashes
  • 89 Airstrikes
  • 229 KAB
  • 7,846 Suicide drones
  • 2,967 Artillery attacks (69 from MLRS)

Russia’s nightly terror attack consisted of 120 Shahed drones and an Iskander-M. Ukraine downed 106 drones

SLAVA UKRAINI

OT: In addition, it was great to see that the Supreme Court in the US dared to go against Trump even though the majority of the judges were Republicans. There is still hope for the USA!


Don't forget to donate, Ukraine's cause is ours! Support Ukraine!

10 thoughts on “Russian losses”

  1. ⚡️Update: 11 people have reportedly been injured as a result of a Ukrainian strike on a Russian ballistic missile factory. The attack was carried out with Flamingo missiles, and it targeted the Votkinsk plant in Russia’s Udmurtia region, where Iskander-M missiles are produced.”
    https://bsky.app/profile/kyivindependent.com/post/3mfdze6srgk2d
    https://kyivindependent.com/drone-strikes-russian-ballistic-missile-factory-over-1-300-km-from-ukraines-border/

  2. An increase in one sector only, Kostyantynivka 26💥💥↗️, while otherwise the pressure of the attacks decreased or was barely maintained. The proportion of unlocalized or Ukrainian attacks also decreased as a share of the Russian localized attacks (from 1 in two to 2 in five).

    N Slobozhansky-Kursk 0↘️
    S Slobozhansky 4↘️
    Kupyansk 8↗️
    Lyman 10💥
    Slovyansk 10💥
    Kramatorsk 0↘️
    Kostyantynivka 26💥💥↗️
    Pokrovsk 39💥💥
    Oleksandrivskij 3↘️
    Huliaipole 18💥↘️
    Orikhivsk 3
    Prydniprovskij/Dnipro 3

    Sum sectors 124↘️
    Unlocalized 51↘️
    Total 175↘️

     

    1. Is sanctions another word for “import via another country”? Or does it actually work? Not only does it make it more difficult, but does it make importing impossible?

  3. I myself am not so convinced that the decision of the Supreme Court showed anything other than that the US Constitution is a robust construction. I am not convinced in itself whether the decision is positive or negative for the USA or the world, and in the world, us or certain antagonists to the West. China, for example, I do not cheer if they get a lot of money back due to the decision of the American Supreme Court. It is money that more or less directly goes to undermine our own economy and security. Hard to swallow, in other words.

    It is easy for anti-Trumpism to take expressions that reinforce instead of solving real problems. Which leads to even stronger Trumpism. Exactly the same mechanisms that have led to the Sweden Democrats growing into one of the stronger parties in Sweden. In their eagerness to criticize someone/something, they shoot themselves in the foot.

    1. I think you have fallen into Trump’s trap, that the exporter pays the customs duty. That’s wrong, it’s the importer and ultimately the American consumer who pays. No money should be paid back to China.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top